Closed
Bug 129329
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
xml-rpc interface embeds additional Carriage Return & Line Feed's in RPC Request Body
Categories
(Core :: XML, defect)
Core
XML
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: frodo.baggins5, Assigned: samuel)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
650 bytes,
patch
|
hjtoi-bugzilla
:
review+
darin.moz
:
superreview+
asa
:
approval+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7+)
Gecko/20020116
BuildID: 20020307
In generating the XmlRpc Msg Request. An additional Carriage Return & Line Feed
('\r\n') is appended to the http header before the Xml Msg Body. After end of
the http header instead of seeing 2 Carriage return/Line Feed combinations a
third Carriage return/Line Feed combination is present. Also in between the
"<?xml version ="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>" and the "<methodCall>" an
additional line feed is added. This is creating an interoperability problem
with the xmlrpc-c library implementation. However, using other XmlRpc libraries
it doesn't seem to be an issue
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Start Up A Network Listener to print out the XML Request Stream
2.Initialize an xmlrpc object and send an XmlRpc Message
3.Examine the Xml Stream that is printed by the Network Listener
Actual Results: The output data should be printed without 3 CR\LF combos after
the HTTP Header and No additional line feed should be present inbetween the <?xml>
and <methodCall> fields.
Expected Results: The CR\LF and LF should not be present in the output Message
Request Stream.
Pending other reason's for not fixing it the following should fix nsXmlRpcClient.js
remove the '\n' from the below line in function XMLWriter():
this.data = '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>\n';
Inside of the _getChannel function remove the request="\r\n" + request; line
Samuel Sieb is the module owner of XML-RPC, reassigning.
Assignee: heikki → samuel
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
The extra cr/nl after the header should have been fixed a while ago. I'll take
a look again.
What's wrong with there being a blank line after the <?xml ?> tag? Isn't that
valid?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Ok,
My Apologies on the first one I checked the newest version in CVS and it has in
fact been removed from the _getChannel function.
As for the '\n' being valid in the XMLWriter() function. I can't say if it is
speced in the XMLRPC specification document, but two other implementations the
Apache XmlRpc implementation in java and the xmlrpc-c library do not produce the
additional '\n' in this spot. This in fact does prevent a server implemented
in xmlrpc-c from processing a request from a mozilla client. To be fair however
the ApacheXmlRpc implementation process's that request correctly. For maximum
portability it would seem to be good to leave the '\n' out of the request.
XML itself allows whitespace after the XML declaration, but if there is a
service that has a bug and cannot handle it, I think it would be nice for us to
not add the newline there. It is still valid XML, just not as nice to read for
humans. But then again, this is being read by a machine so who cares...
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: patch
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment on attachment 72912 [details] [diff] [review]
remove newline
r=heikki
Attachment #72912 -
Flags: review+
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 72912 [details] [diff] [review]
remove newline
rs=darin
Attachment #72912 -
Flags: superreview+
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 72912 [details] [diff] [review]
remove newline
a=asa (on behalf of drivers) for checkin to the 1.0 trunk
Attachment #72912 -
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
checked in to trunk
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•23 years ago
|
QA Contact: petersen → rakeshmishra
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•