Closed
Bug 1294191
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Create new component: Toolkit::Flyweb
Categories
(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: Administration, task)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mhoye, Assigned: dkl)
Details
Flyweb project should have its own component at this point, likely under Toolkit.
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
We need the following info (taken from https://wiki.mozilla.org/BMO/Requesting_Changes#Components) to fulfill this request:
(required) The name of the component
(required) The product it should go in
(required) A longer description
(optional) It's highly recommended that the default assignee for new bugs is 'nobody@mozilla.org', however this can be changed if required
(optional) Normally the "QA Contact" is empty, but you can optionally set it to a specific individual
(optional) Any flags (bug and/or attachment) that will need to be visible for bugs against the new component
(optional) The list of suggested reviewers for the review flag (uses the product's review suggestions by default)
Flags: needinfo?(mhoye)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Component: Flyweb
Product: Toolkit
Description:
Bugs related to the Flyweb project - implementation, discovery, networking and UX.
Default assignee: nobody@mozilla.org
Suggested reviewers:
Kannan Vijayan <kvijayan@mozilla.com>
(some more shortly I think, but for now Kannan.)
Flags: needinfo?(mhoye)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dkl
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
Added
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Hoye [:mhoye] from comment #0)
> Flyweb project should have its own component at this point, likely under
> Toolkit.
Why under Toolkit?
Updated•8 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mhoye)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Fits the general description of "as set of APIs built on top of Gecko", I thought. Are we revisiting this decision?
Flags: needinfo?(mhoye)
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Hoye [:mhoye] from comment #5)
> Fits the general description of "as set of APIs built on top of Gecko", I
> thought. Are we revisiting this decision?
I would like to but I shall file a new bug to do so.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
OK - the right person to loop in for that is Kannan, I'm just pushing the paper around for him here.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•