Closed
Bug 1317915
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Tier-2 Mac 10.7 Build fails on Beta
Categories
(Taskcluster :: General, defect)
Taskcluster
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1297716
People
(Reporter: cbook, Assigned: wcosta)
References
(
URL
)
Details
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=1923053&repo=mozilla-beta
seems the problem is a configuration problem:
03:23:05 INFO - checking for target system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-apple-darwin3.13.0-100-generic': machine `x86_64-apple-darwin3.13.0-100' not recognized
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Greg, Pete: no idea who manages Mac configuration but this seems to be a kind of error. Its tier-2 so no tree closing etc but i guess we should fix this.
Seems this somehow started after the merge from aurora to beta
Flags: needinfo?(pmoore)
Flags: needinfo?(garndt)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
wander, i was told you might know something about the configuration here :)
Flags: needinfo?(wcosta)
Flags: needinfo?(pmoore)
Flags: needinfo?(garndt)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
beta is using universal builds, which is WIP in bug 1183613. The issue is that it is composing the target name with `uname` [1], which returns the Linux kernel version.
[1] http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/file/tip/build/macosx/universal/mozconfig.common#l7
Depends on: 1183613
Flags: needinfo?(wcosta)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Even with bug 1183613 we might want to tweak the build config here--IIRC (I tracked this down in another bug) mozharness overrides the osx opt build mozconfig on beta to force a universal build. mshal is going to add a separate cross-universal build in that bug, maybe we should also change the mozharness stuff to not force a universal build, so that we're not doing two separate universal builds?
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Hidden, since I'm tired of looking at permared. If, as I suspect, fixing it is P∞, it would be better to stop running it in-tree so I can remove that treeherder exclusion rule now, since there's no more than a 5% chance I'll remember to remove it after the next merge to beta.
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Oh! bug 1297716 was the bug already on file for this.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•