Closed
Bug 1321535
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Arial Black is not Arial 900
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 644385
People
(Reporter: antoine.leverve.ext, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: fonts)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; rv:11.0) like Gecko
Steps to reproduce:
I used the Arial Black font
Actual results:
The display was incorrect, looking not bold at all compared to IE or CR.
But if I use instead Arial with a 900 font-weight and that worked! I am doing that now because my boss wants a fix, but that's dirty, Arial Black is in the list of recommended web fonts from w3school.
Expected results:
Arial Black should display the same as Arial with a 900 font-weight
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
OS: Unspecified → Windows 7
Hardware: Unspecified → x86_64
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
"Arial Black" is recognized as a font family name under the legacy GDI model, where families were limited to four faces, but is categorized as a face within the larger "Arial" family under DirectWrite. See John Daggett's explanations in bug 644385.
So you should use the pattern suggested there, with CSS properties such as
font-family: Arial Black, Arial, sans-serif;
font-weight: 900;
which selects the desired face under both models.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Moving from Core::Untriaged to Core::General https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1407598
Component: Untriaged → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•