1334607 - (02-gdoc_create_copypaste_txt_1) 02 - gdoc_create_copypaste_txt_1

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(Core :: General, defect)

Description

[Andrew Overholt [:overholt]]

STR:
1. Go to docs.google.com and click "Blank" to create a new blank document
2. Type the following text:

Answer: Depending on how one distinguishes a different Bible version from a revision of an existing Bible version, there are as many as 50 different English versions of the Bible. The question then arises: Is there really a need for so many different English versions of the Bible? The answer is, of course, no, there is no need for 50 different English versions of the Bible. This is especially true considering that there are hundreds of languages into which the entire Bible has not yet been translated. At the same time, there is nothing wrong with there being multiple versions of the Bible in a language. In fact, multiple versions of the Bible can actually be an aid in understanding the message of the Bible.

3. Press <Enter> twice
4. Type the following text:

There are two primary reasons for the different English Bible versions. (1) Over time, the English language changes/develops, making updates to an English version necessary. If a modern reader were to pick up a 1611 King James Version of the Bible, he would find it to be virtually unreadable. Everything from the spelling, to syntax, to grammar, to phraseology is very different. Linguists state that the English language has changed more in the past 400 years than the Greek language has changed in the past 2,000 years. Several times in church history, believers have gotten ?used? to a particular Bible version and become fiercely loyal to it, resisting any attempts to update/revise it. This occurred with the Septuagint, the Latin Vulgate, and more recently, the King James Version. Fierce loyalty to a particular version of the Bible is illogical and counterproductive. When the Bible was written, it was written in the common language of the people at that time. When the Bible is translated, it should be translated into how a people/language group speaks/reads at that time, not how it spoke hundreds of years ago.

5. Press <Enter> once.
6. Hold <Ctrl> and press a to select all the text in the document.
7. Hold <Ctrl> and press 'x' to cut all the text.
8. Hold <Ctrl> and press 'v' to paste all the text.
9. Hold <Ctrl> and press 'v' to paste all the text again.

Hasal testcase upon which I'm basing the above steps:

https://github.com/Mozilla-TWQA/Hasal/blob/master/tests/regression/gdoc/test_chrome_gdoc_create_txt_1.sikuli/test_chrome_gdoc_create_txt_1.py
https://github.com/Mozilla-TWQA/Hasal/blob/master/tests/regression/gdoc/test_firefox_gdoc_create_txt_1.sikuli/test_firefox_gdoc_create_txt_1.py

Forthcoming information:
- screen capture videos showing the experience in both Chrome and Firefox
- cleopatra profiles
- about:support details for the machines where this reproduces

Comment 1

[Andrew Overholt [:overholt]]

A recent run of the above Hasal tests showed that, of 30 test runs, the median values running this were:

Chrome 55.0.2883.87m: 47.194 s
Firefox nightly around 2016-12-13 (https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1ea0c60db5d2): 81.210 s (34.016 s slower which is ~41.89%)