Intermittent dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js | Test timed out -
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: bulk-close-intermittents, intermittent-failure, Whiteboard: [stockwell disabled])
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
![]() |
||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•8 years ago
|
![]() |
||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 21•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 33•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 34•7 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 38•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 39•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment 40•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 41•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 42•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 43•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 44•7 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 49•7 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 58•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 59•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment 60•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 61•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 103•6 years ago
|
||
There are 26 failures in the last 7 days on macosx1014-64-shippable opt:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/intermittent-failures.html#/bugdetails?startday=2019-08-30&endday=2019-09-06&tree=trunk&bug=1336075
Recent failure log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=265256378&repo=autoland&lineNumber=4841
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.216Z] 00:25:40 INFO - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js | Test timed out -
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.216Z] 00:25:40 INFO - GECKO(2030) | JavaScript error: resource://testing-common/PromiseTestUtils.jsm, line 112: uncaught exception: Object
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.216Z] 00:25:40 INFO - Console message: [JavaScript Error: "uncaught exception: Object" {file: "resource://testing-common/PromiseTestUtils.jsm" line: 112}]
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.217Z] 00:25:40 INFO - GECKO(2030) | MEMORY STAT | vsize 7736MB | residentFast 360MB | heapAllocated 90MB
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.217Z] 00:25:40 INFO - TEST-OK | dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js | took 180043ms
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.217Z] 00:25:40 INFO - Not taking screenshot here: see the one that was previously logged
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.217Z] 00:25:40 INFO - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js | Found a tab after previous test timed out: about:blank -
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.217Z] 00:25:40 INFO - checking window state
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.217Z] 00:25:40 INFO - TEST-START | dom/tests/browser/browser_localStorage_e10s.js
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.229Z] 00:25:40 INFO - Not taking screenshot here: see the one that was previously logged
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.230Z] 00:25:40 INFO - Buffered messages logged at 00:25:40
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.230Z] 00:25:40 INFO - Entering test bound
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.230Z] 00:25:40 INFO - Buffered messages finished
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.230Z] 00:25:40 INFO - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | dom/tests/browser/browser_localStorage_e10s.js | uncaught exception - ReferenceError: ok is not defined at observer@chrome://mochitests/content/browser/dom/tests/browser/helper_largeAllocation.js:17:7
[task 2019-09-06T00:25:40.230Z] 00:25:40 INFO - _insertBrowser@chrome://browser/content/tabbrowser.js:2361:24
Hsin, what could be done about this?
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 106•6 years ago
|
||
Hi Nika, could you please give us a hint here of what we should do for the next? Also, could you think of recent changes that caused a raise on the failure rate in the past week? Thank you.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 108•6 years ago
|
||
Not sure where in here we're actually running into the issue, but it appears like it might be somewhere in this range: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/588814f2edddf0e132d77d326ddae50911e8bad1/dom/tests/browser/helper_largeAllocation.js#250-260 (probably waiting for the expectProcessCreated
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/588814f2edddf0e132d77d326ddae50911e8bad1/dom/tests/browser/helper_largeAllocation.js#258). I'm not entirely sure why that would be happening and I don't have a ton of time to look into it.
It also, interestingly, looks like it's always happening on macos. We never run the largeAllocation header on macos (only ever on 32-bit windows), so if this becomes an issue, we can probably turn off the test.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 113•6 years ago
|
||
40 failures were associated with this bug in the last 7 days: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/intermittent-failures.html#/bugdetails?startday=2019-10-01&endday=2019-10-08&tree=trunk&bug=1336075
Recent failure log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=270178854&repo=autoland&lineNumber=4193
This failed on: macosx1014-64-shippable, windows10-64, windows10-64-qr debug and opt build types.
:Nika Layzell, can we disable this?
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 115•6 years ago
|
||
If this isn't happening on 32-bit Windows (doesn't look like it is), we should disable the tests. Can we do architecture/OS-specific disabling?
(Nika and I briefly chatted about this)
Comment 116•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 117•6 years ago
•
|
||
For the win32 failures there is Bug 1586957, newly filed. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/intermittent-failures.html#/bugdetails?startday=2019-10-01&endday=2019-10-08&tree=trunk&bug=1586957
![]() |
||
Comment 118•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cosmin Sabou [:CosminS] from comment #117)
For the win32 failures there is Bug 1586957, newly filed. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/intermittent-failures.html#/bugdetails?startday=2019-10-01&endday=2019-10-08&tree=trunk&bug=1586957
That is a different test.
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #115)
If this isn't happening on 32-bit Windows (doesn't look like it is), we should disable the tests. Can we do architecture/OS-specific disabling?
This test is already skipped on many platforms, including 32-bit Windows.
$ ./mach test-info tests dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js
===== dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js =====
Found dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js in source control.
dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js found in manifest dom/tests/browser/browser.ini
flavor: browser-chrome
skip-if: fission || !e10s || (os == "win" && (processor == "x86" || processor == "aarch64")) || (verify && debug && (os == 'linux')) || (os == 'linux') || (os == 'mac' && debug)
Querying ActiveData...
Found records matching 'dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js' in ActiveData.
Test results for dom/tests/browser/browser_largeAllocation_non_win32.js on mozilla-central,mozilla-inbound,autoland between 2019-10-01 and 2019-10-08
linux64/asan-opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 161 skipped) in 161 runs
linux64/ccov-debug-e10s: 0 failures ( 29 skipped) in 29 runs
linux64/debug-e10s-service-worker: 0 failures ( 25 skipped) in 25 runs
linux64/debug-e10s: 0 failures ( 161 skipped) in 161 runs
linux64/debug-fis: 0 failures ( 265 skipped) in 265 runs
linux64/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 177 skipped) in 177 runs
linux64/opt-fis: 0 failures ( 25 skipped) in 25 runs
macosx1014-64-shippable/opt-e10s: 24 failures ( 0 skipped) in 215 runs
macosx1014-64/debug-e10s: 0 failures ( 318 skipped) in 318 runs
windows10-64-qr/debug-e10s-qr: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 363 runs
windows10-64-qr/opt-e10s-qr: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 24 runs
windows10-64-qr/opt-fis-qr: 0 failures ( 27 skipped) in 27 runs
windows10-64-shippable-qr/opt-e10s-qr: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 155 runs
windows10-64-shippable/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 148 runs
windows10-64-shippable/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 23 runs
windows10-64/asan-opt-e10s: 1 failures ( 0 skipped) in 424 runs
windows10-64/ccov-debug-e10s: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 22 runs
windows10-64/debug-e10s: 10 failures ( 0 skipped) in 273 runs
windows10-64/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 0 skipped) in 26 runs
windows10-64/opt-fis: 0 failures ( 26 skipped) in 26 runs
windows10-aarch64/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 24 skipped) in 24 runs
windows7-32-shippable/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 151 skipped) in 151 runs
windows7-32/debug-e10s: 0 failures ( 162 skipped) in 162 runs
windows7-32/opt-e10s: 0 failures ( 24 skipped) in 24 runs
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 121•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #118)
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #115)
If this isn't happening on 32-bit Windows (doesn't look like it is), we should disable the tests. Can we do architecture/OS-specific disabling?
This test is already skipped on many platforms, including 32-bit Windows.
OK, thanks for confirming. That's worrying since this feature is only for 32-bit Windows :)
Can we get some quick manual testing done here to get a regression range for when this broke? It worked in 53, at least (see bug 1331083). The test plan is available here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Large-Allocation_header.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 123•6 years ago
|
||
Might be something to keep an eye on for 71.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 124•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #121)
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #118)
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #115)
If this isn't happening on 32-bit Windows (doesn't look like it is), we should disable the tests. Can we do architecture/OS-specific disabling?
This test is already skipped on many platforms, including 32-bit Windows.
OK, thanks for confirming. That's worrying since this feature is only for 32-bit Windows :)
Can we get some quick manual testing done here to get a regression range for when this broke? It worked in 53, at least (see bug 1331083). The test plan is available here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Large-Allocation_header.
Hi Bogdan,
As comments above, there's a chance the Large-Allocation header might have stopped working and we're seeing a corresponding increase in OOMs (bug 1584266 and bug 1584232). As you've been helping some testing for bug 1584232, would you please to help us get a regression range here? It's something we consider urgent.
Comment 125•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #124)
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #121)
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #118)
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #115)
If this isn't happening on 32-bit Windows (doesn't look like it is), we should disable the tests. Can we do architecture/OS-specific disabling?
This test is already skipped on many platforms, including 32-bit Windows.
OK, thanks for confirming. That's worrying since this feature is only for 32-bit Windows :)
Can we get some quick manual testing done here to get a regression range for when this broke? It worked in 53, at least (see bug 1331083). The test plan is available here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Large-Allocation_header.
Hi Bogdan,
As comments above, there's a chance the Large-Allocation header might have stopped working and we're seeing a corresponding increase in OOMs (bug 1584266 and bug 1584232). As you've been helping some testing for bug 1584232, would you please to help us get a regression range here? It's something we consider urgent.
Okay, Alphan seemed find an STR, that it's broken on the latest nightly but worked on Fx59. He will try to narrow down the range. We will ask for help if needed later.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 126•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #125)
(In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #124)
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #121)
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #118)
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #115)
If this isn't happening on 32-bit Windows (doesn't look like it is), we should disable the tests. Can we do architecture/OS-specific disabling?
This test is already skipped on many platforms, including 32-bit Windows.
OK, thanks for confirming. That's worrying since this feature is only for 32-bit Windows :)
Can we get some quick manual testing done here to get a regression range for when this broke? It worked in 53, at least (see bug 1331083). The test plan is available here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Large-Allocation_header.
Hi Bogdan,
As comments above, there's a chance the Large-Allocation header might have stopped working and we're seeing a corresponding increase in OOMs (bug 1584266 and bug 1584232). As you've been helping some testing for bug 1584232, would you please to help us get a regression range here? It's something we consider urgent.Okay, Alphan seemed find an STR, that it's broken on the latest nightly but worked on Fx59. He will try to narrow down the range. We will ask for help if needed later.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1584266#c13
There's no STR to figure out if LargeAllocation is broken on certain version. Bingo Blitz app that was mentioned in the test plan seems not use this header now.
Comment 127•6 years ago
|
||
Finding Regression Range by automated test is not something Manual QA worked before. Over the last few days I tried to work with other QA managers as well however without the exact steps we couldn't help much here.
Comment 128•6 years ago
|
||
Talking to a few people, it seems like we should likely work toward un-shipping Large-Allocation so I'm not sure how much we have to worry about these intermittents and maybe we should just turn them off.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
![]() |
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 130•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 131•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 133•6 years ago
|
||
Untracking for 71 since this is now a P2.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 155•11 months ago
|
||
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bug_Triage#Intermittent_Test_Failure_Cleanup
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Updated•10 months ago
|
Description
•