Closed Bug 1346821 Opened 9 years ago Closed 8 years ago

[feature request] Rich Text Editor: more buttons that insert additional HTML tags

Categories

(support.mozilla.org - Lithium :: User Experience & Design, enhancement)

Product:
support.mozilla.org - Lithium
Component:
User Experience & Design
Type:
enhancement
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: underpass_bugzilla, Unassigned)

References

Details

User Story

As a user of the text editor window, I want to have buttons to insert the following formatting features in the Rich Text view:

- "button" formatting

- "menu option" formatting

- (please edit this User Story to add more)

Thanks to this, I can avoid having to use the HTML view and learning the additional parameters required - and format the text in a way that's helpful for the readers to identify the context of the information easily.
RTF editor doesn't seem to allow the insert of special tags like <div class="for" data-for="linux"> and they are only visible in the HTML editor. We need the capability to insert special tags like FOR, buttons, keys, menu, preferences, and the like even with RTF editor. See discussion https://support.mozilla.org/t5/Knowledge-Base-L10n-Discussions/How-to-insert-buttons-keys-for-s-etc/m-p/1375623 Thanks.
User Story: (updated)
Summary: Need editor tags to insert buttons, keys, "for", etc. → [feature request] Rich Text Editor: more buttons that insert additional HTML tags
+NI Madalina for handling & prioritization
Flags: needinfo?(mana)
The new platform gives us the opportunity to rethink the styling for menu options, buttons and other choices. Let's take a look at other sites first and see if buttons are still the best option.
Flags: needinfo?(mana)
Component: Knowledge Base Content → User Experience & Design
Severity: major → normal
Marking INVALID. We aren't moving back to Lithium - see https://blog.mozilla.org/sumo/2017/06/28/important-platform-update/
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.