Closed
Bug 135408
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
[ps] Printing a page to PostScript calls non existing "Helvetica_Oblique"
Categories
(Core :: Printing: Output, defect, P1)
Core
Printing: Output
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Future
People
(Reporter: gert, Assigned: rods)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.00 KB,
patch
|
drbrain-bugzilla
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
dbaron
:
approval+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311
BuildID: 2002031103
When printing a page to PostScript mozilla includes the line
/Helvetica_Oblique findfont
The name of the font is wrong. It should be:
/Helvetica-Oblique findfont
^
When sending this file to a PostScript printer, it results in the error message:
Helvetica_Oblique not found, using Courier
and the resulting print will be suboptimal.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Ctr-P
2. choose Print To: File
3. click Print
Actual Results: a file "mozilla.ps" (or whatever name you choose) is printed.
the command:
grep Helvetica mozilla.ps
results in:
/Helvetica findfont
/Helvetica-Bold findfont
/Helvetica-BoldOblique findfont
/Helvetica_Oblique findfont
The last line shows the incorrect fontname, using an underscore instead of a dash.
Expected Results: It should have printed:
/Helvetica-Oblique findfont
I found this behavior in several builds of mozilla.
The recent build mentioned above, the build that came with Gnome-1.4
provided by Sun and in the most recent Netscape-6.2 for linux.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
same for me with Mozilla 0.9.9 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020313
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
"/Helvetica_Oblique findfont" is still what is inside mozilla.ps when printing the page with 2002-04-04-04 on Linux. Confirming. ->NEW
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
I must add, however, that my postscript printer does not complain about the font if it's called Helvetica_Oblique. The printout is identical, at least to my eye, with either name. But judging from a search on google, Helvetica-Oblique certainly seams to be the right name.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: printing a page to PostScript calls non excisting Helvetica_Oblique → [PATCH]printing a page to PostScript calls non excisting Helvetica_Oblique
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
changed the "_" to a "-"
| Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: mozilla1.0 → Future
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Rods, why do you future a bug that has a trivial patch?
Updated•22 years ago
|
OS: SunOS → All
Hardware: Sun → All
For the record, we've found a printer at our site that chokes on the printout because of this font name. When we edit the file to change the name to Helvetica-0blique, it prints successfully. The printer is an "HP Color Laserjet 8550DN"
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
I'm using mozilla 1.1, and this ***TRIVIAL*** bug is still not fixed. It destroys output on several printers, including my Brother HL-1650 printer. Note that ghostscript cannot find the font either (duh!), but it has a better algorithm to find a similar font than most printers, which means that ghostscript users won't have a problem. Please fix it for the next 1.0.x and 1.1.x!!!
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: [PATCH]printing a page to PostScript calls non excisting Helvetica_Oblique → [ps] Printing a page to PostScript calls non existing "Helvetica_Oblique"
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #77829 -
Flags: review+
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 77829 [details] [diff] [review] patch sr=bzbarsky, noting that the r= was drbrain-bugzilla@segment7.net
Attachment #77829 -
Flags: superreview+
Comment on attachment 77829 [details] [diff] [review] patch a=dbaron for trunk checkin
Attachment #77829 -
Flags: approval+
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Checked in for 1.2alpha. Thanks to Mark Roberts for bringing this bug up on n.p.m.unix.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 175723 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 190923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 227535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•