Get rid of `self.wait_for_condition()` in favor of `Wait().until()`
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: Marionette, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
(firefox71 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox71 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: whimboo, Assigned: rgpt, Mentored)
Details
(Whiteboard: [lang=py][good first bug])
User Story
To get familiar with Marionette tests please read through: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/testing/marionette/NewContributors.html
Attachments
(1 file, 5 obsolete files)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Updated•8 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Reporter | ||
Comment 15•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment 17•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 18•8 years ago
|
||
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Reporter | ||
Comment 20•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 21•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment 22•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 23•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 24•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 25•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 26•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 27•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 28•8 years ago
|
||
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 31•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 32•8 years ago
|
||
Updated•8 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 33•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 34•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 35•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 36•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 37•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 38•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 39•8 years ago
|
||
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 41•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 42•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 43•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 44•7 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 46•7 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 47•7 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 48•7 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 49•7 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 50•7 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment 51•7 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 52•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 53•7 years ago
|
||
Implemented all what Aseem's previously implemented and the other changes @whimboo suggested.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 54•6 years ago
|
||
Fixing this bug got way simpler due to some code removals in the past months. If someone wants to have a look at it, I'm happy to still mentor.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 55•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) [⌚️UTC+2] from comment #54)
Fixing this bug got way simpler due to some code removals in the past months. If someone wants to have a look at it, I'm happy to still mentor.
Hi,
Is the issue still open?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 56•6 years ago
|
||
Given that this is an outstanding issue we would like to get fixed soon, I already asked Rishi yesterday to take care of it. He just haven't had the time to reply here.
Aaditya, if you are interested in a good first bug - and I see you just joined Bugzilla - I would propose bug 1583504 to you. If you want to take it just comment over there, and we can get you started. Thanks
| Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 57•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) [⌚️UTC+2] from comment #56)
Given that this is an outstanding issue we would like to get fixed soon, I already asked Rishi yesterday to take care of it. He just haven't had the time to reply here.
Aaditya, if you are interested in a good first bug - and I see you just joined Bugzilla - I would propose bug 1583504 to you. If you want to take it just comment over there, and we can get you started. Thanks
Ok. I will comment over there.
Thank you.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 58•6 years ago
|
||
Thank you : whimboo. I will start working on this enhancement.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 59•6 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 60•6 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 61•6 years ago
|
||
Rishi, with the latest push you added again a new revision of your patch. Not sure which command you used, but please really update the original revision instead. Therefore check that the commit message contains a reference to the phabricator revision, which should have been added by moz-phab by default when you did the first push. Successive pushes will just update that same revision.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 62•6 years ago
|
||
:whimboo, I created a separate revision for the patch using 'arc diff --create' for the review. So if there is a fold required then it should come in a separate revision apart from that same revision is to be updated. From now on i will update in the latest revision itself and can mark the first revision https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47533 as abandon ?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 63•6 years ago
|
||
No, please do not use arc directly, but moz-phab submit to submit all the commits of a bookmark. It will take care automatically if revisions have to be created or just updated. It also keep the review flow in-tact. For this time please abandon D47533 yes, but lets make sure to not have such a situation again. Also because I already mentioned it on the last bug you were working on. Thanks.
Updated•6 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 64•6 years ago
|
||
@whimboo, i have made modifications as discussed with you. Also, i will make sure to use moz-phab instead of arcanist directly.
Comment 65•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 66•6 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•