Closed
Bug 1354900
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Assertion failure in PluginInstanceChild::NPN_FinalizeAsyncSurface
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect)
Core Graveyard
Plug-ins
Tracking
(firefox55 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla55
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox55 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mayhemer, Assigned: handyman)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.37 KB,
patch
|
dvander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
MOZ_ASSERT(!surface || mCurrentDirectSurface != surface);
where mCurrentDirectSurface == surface and are non-null.
xul.dll!MOZ_NoReturn(2914) Line 213 C++
> xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::PluginInstanceChild::NPN_FinalizeAsyncSurface(0x0422ec4c) Line 2914 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::child::_finalizeasyncsurface(0x0422dc40, 0x0422ec4c) Line 1808 C++
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!030587cc() Unknown
[Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll]
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!0307035f() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!0306e6f3() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!03075307() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!03071b1c() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!030727d7() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!0307377c() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!03070e6e() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!0306e562() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!035fd06d() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!0305caa8() Unknown
NPSWF32_25_0_0_127.dll!0305cd0f() Unknown
xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::PluginModuleChild::NPP_Destroy(0x00f53c00) Line 326 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::PluginInstanceChild::Destroy() Line 4309 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::PluginInstanceChild::AnswerNPP_Destroy(0x006ff7d8) Line 4364 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::PPluginInstanceChild::OnCallReceived({...}, 0x00000000) Line 3301 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::plugins::PPluginModuleChild::OnCallReceived({...}, 0x00000000) Line 1238 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::DispatchInterruptMessage({...}, 0) Line 1942 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::DispatchMessageW({...}) Line 1806 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::RunMessage({...}) Line 1681 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::MessageTask::Run() Line 1714 C++
xul.dll!MessageLoop::RunTask({...}) Line 362 C++
xul.dll!MessageLoop::DeferOrRunPendingTask({...}) Line 372 C++
xul.dll!MessageLoop::DoWork() Line 444 C++
xul.dll!base::MessagePumpForUI::DoRunLoop() Line 212 C++
xul.dll!base::MessagePumpWin::RunWithDispatcher(0x006ffdb0, 0x00000000) Line 58 C++
xul.dll!base::MessagePumpWin::Run(0x006ffdb0) Line 80 C++
xul.dll!MessageLoop::RunInternal() Line 239 C++
xul.dll!MessageLoop::RunHandler() Line 225 C++
xul.dll!MessageLoop::Run() Line 212 C++
xul.dll!XRE_InitChildProcess(5, 0x00f010a0, 0x006ffe88) Line 703 C++
xul.dll!mozilla::BootstrapImpl::XRE_InitChildProcess(7, 0x00f010a0, 0x006ffe88) Line 65 C++
plugin-container.exe!content_process_main(0x00f0e070, 7, 0x00f010a0) Line 64 C++
plugin-container.exe!NS_internal_main(8, 0x00f010a0) Line 25 C++
plugin-container.exe!wmain(8, 0x0093ceb0) Line 111 C++
plugin-container.exe!__scrt_common_main_seh() Line 253 C++
STR, 100% repro:
- debug build (32bit) of m-c
- clean profile
- load cnn.com
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
David, is this a sign of a Flash bug? If so do we need this assertion or can we handle this more gracefully? Does this need to block rollout of async painting to beta/release?
Flags: needinfo?(dvander)
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #1) > David, is this a sign of a Flash bug? If so do we need this assertion or can > we handle this more gracefully? > > Does this need to block rollout of async painting to beta/release? We know about this, it's a side effect of some changes adobe made to the way they handle these surfaces for bug 1306698. It's not considered blocking. I need to to take this to adobe, but I wanted to wait until the other stuff we had out to them was closed out. There's more information in bug 1306698, comment 34.
Blocks: 1306698
Flags: needinfo?(dvander)
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Can we remove the assertion, if this is semi-expected? Debug builds shouldn't be crashing on normal browsing like this.
Flags: needinfo?(jmathies)
I wouldn't object to removing it. We always copy the texture and mCurrentDirectSurface might be pointless. It's only there to "enforce" the API.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
Removes the assert. It would be a good idea to track this somehow so we can reverse it.
Attachment #8856735 -
Flags: review?(dvander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Tests: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=900479a831b05a2c8097cb2cbfaa91721ebcac36
Attachment #8856735 -
Flags: review?(dvander) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
That was fast ;)
Assignee: nobody → davidp99
Keywords: checkin-needed
Pushed by ryanvm@gmail.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/e3b2db0bf090 Remove ASSERT when plugin incorrectly finalizes async surface. r=dvander
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e3b2db0bf090
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla55
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
Thank you guys.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jmathies)
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•