Closed Bug 1357993 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

Permaorange in dom/base/test/test_domwindowutils.html when Gecko 55 merges to beta on 2017-06-12

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P1)

55 Branch
defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla55
Tracking Status
firefox-esr45 --- unaffected
firefox-esr52 --- unaffected
firefox53 --- unaffected
firefox54 --- unaffected
firefox55 + fixed

People

(Reporter: philor, Assigned: daisuke)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

If you're going to do anything with animations, you have to set the pref, to not break on beta and release. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=92882764&repo=try (should be able to repro locally by just changing /config/milestone.txt from 55a1 to 55). [Tracking Requested - why for this release]: Merge bustage, closed tree, delayed b1, anguish.
Flags: needinfo?(dakatsuka)
Tracking 55+ for this permaorange, especially to avoid delays in B1.
Thanks, Phil. I fix this one.
Flags: needinfo?(dakatsuka)
(In reply to Daisuke Akatsuka (:daisuke) from comment #2) > Thanks, Phil. > I fix this one. Thanks Daisuke!
Assignee: nobody → dakatsuka
Priority: -- → P1
Comment on attachment 8860823 [details] Bug 1357993: Set dom.animations-api.core.enabled preference. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/132814/#review135630 It's hard to review this kind of changes between files on MozReview... ::: dom/base/test/file_domwindowutils_animation.html:6 (Diff revision 1) > +<!DOCTYPE html> > +<html> > +<head> > + <meta charset="UTF-8"> > + <title>DOMWindowUtils test with animation</title> > + <style></style> Do we really need this <style>? ::: dom/base/test/file_domwindowutils_animation.html:140 (Diff revision 1) > +} > + > +window.addEventListener("load", test_getUnanimatedComputedStyle); > + > +</script> > +</pre> I don't see any <pre>.
Attachment #8860823 - Flags: review?(hikezoe) → review+
Comment on attachment 8860823 [details] Bug 1357993: Set dom.animations-api.core.enabled preference. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/132814/#review135630 > Do we really need this <style>? Thank you for your quick response, Hiro! I wrote to add style like: document.styleSheets[0].insertRule(cssAnimationStyle, 0); ( line 48 ) Or, is it might better to make a new <style> using createElement?
(In reply to Daisuke Akatsuka (:daisuke) from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 8860823 [details] > Bug 1357993: Set dom.animations-api.core.enabled preference. > > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/132814/#review135630 > > > Do we really need this <style>? > > Thank you for your quick response, Hiro! > > I wrote to add style like: > > document.styleSheets[0].insertRule(cssAnimationStyle, 0); ( line 48 ) > > Or, is it might better to make a new <style> using createElement? I think so, just like we do in addStyle() in dom/animation/test/testcommon.js.
But of course, it's up to you.
(In reply to Hiroyuki Ikezoe (:hiro) from comment #8) > But of course, it's up to you. I'll modify as same to addStyle(). Thanks!
Pushed by dakatsuka@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/d0c2cde6611a Set dom.animations-api.core.enabled preference. r=hiro
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla55
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: