v1 Study validation bug: 1312950 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1312950 +++ Please supply the following: * Define study branches in the user story of the bug * What is the main effect you are looking for? If not looking for an effect, what is the total number of participants needed (and be sure to state why you need that many)? * How will this effect be measured? (What is the instrumentation? E.g. X% more windows opened, etc). * What is the required effect size to draw a conclusion? Prior art: * If there is prior art (e.g. testpilot, usertesting.com, field research, etc.), review it in the bug (and link as necessary) * If there are previous results (particularly if they allow for the removal of experimental branches), review them here. * State whether or not you intend to test your add-on and how you'll go about doing this
Javaun, Can you review if the branches for v2 are correct? (from your email) Control (no changes at all, except the user is in the experiment and has the additional shield probes) One-offs (I believe we’re keeping this, but I may be incorrect) Unified as we did in v1 (browser.urlbar.maxRichResults;10) Unified with 6 results (browser.urlbar.maxRichResults;6)
Assignee: nobody → jmoradi
Summary: [SHIELD] Study Validation Review for Unified URL Bar → [SHIELD] Study Validation Review for Unified URL Bar v2
Glind, Do you need anything for this? Thanks Shilpi
Same design as last study, but with one additional branch. Signing off.
Thanks for closing it out!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.