Closed
Bug 1376234
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Convert some xpcshell-tests in toolkit/components/places/tests/unit to async Bookmarks.jsm API
Categories
(Toolkit :: Places, enhancement, P2)
Toolkit
Places
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla56
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox56 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: standard8, Assigned: standard8)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
I've transitioned around 20 tests or so mostly to the new async Bookmarks.jsm API.
The only API I haven't transitioned is runInBatchMode - we can do that in a follow-up bug.
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8881187 [details]
Bug 1376234 - Convert some xpcshell-tests in toolkit/components/places/tests/unit to async Bookmarks.jsm API.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/152460/#review157766
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_PlacesUtils_lazyobservers.js:5
(Diff revision 1)
> /* Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ */
>
> -function run_test() {
> - do_test_pending();
> +add_task(async function test_lazyBookmarksObservers() {
> + const TEST_URI = NetUtil.newURI("http://moz.org/");
Services.io
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_PlacesUtils_lazyobservers.js:7
(Diff revision 1)
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ */
>
> -function run_test() {
> - do_test_pending();
> +add_task(async function test_lazyBookmarksObservers() {
> + const TEST_URI = NetUtil.newURI("http://moz.org/");
> +
> + let promise = Promise.defer();
promiseUtils.defer() or new Promise()
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_frecency_observers.js:64
(Diff revision 1)
> });
>
> function onFrecencyChanged(expectedURI) {
> return new Promise(resolve => {
> let obs = new NavHistoryObserver();
> + do_print("Observing");
leftover or actually wanted?
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_history_autocomplete_tags.js:146
(Diff revision 1)
> * @param aURI
> * The nsIURI to tag.
> * @param aTags
> * The tags to add.
> */
> -function tagURI(aURI, aTags) {
> +async function tagURI(aURI, aTags) {
nit: may s/aURI/url/ and aTags/tags/ and just pass url to insert.
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_hosts_triggers.js:137
(Diff revision 1)
> + unfiledBookmarksRoot.getChild(unfiledBookmarksRoot.childCount - 1).bookmarkGuid;
> +
> + await PlacesUtils.bookmarks.remove(itemGuid);
Services.io
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_isvisited.js:67
(Diff revision 1)
> do_check_true(error.message.includes("No items were added to history"));
> });
> do_check_false(await promiseIsURIVisited(cantAddUri));
> }
> }
> });
Is there a newline at EOF here per coding style? mozreview is not able to tell me that and I don't recall if we have eslint for that.
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_markpageas.js
(Diff revision 1)
>
> await completionPromise;
>
> PlacesUtils.history.removeObserver(observer);
> });
> -
ditto for the closing newline
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_nsINavHistoryViewer.js:192
(Diff revision 1)
> - PlacesUtils.bookmarks.insertBookmark(PlacesUtils.bookmarks.bookmarksMenuFolder,
> - uri("http://google.com"),
> - PlacesUtils.bookmarks.DEFAULT_INDEX,
> - "foo");
> - PlacesUtils.bookmarks.moveItem(testBookmark2, PlacesUtils.bookmarks.bookmarksMenuFolder, 0);
> - do_check_eq(resultObserver.movedNode.itemId, testBookmark2);
> + parentGuid: PlacesUtils.bookmarks.menuGuid,
> + url: "http://google.com",
> + title: "foo"
> + });
> +
> + let bm2Id = await PlacesUtils.promiseItemId(testBookmark2.guid);
can you rather use movedNode.bookmarkGuid to compare?
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_nsINavHistoryViewer.js:203
(Diff revision 1)
> + });
> + do_check_eq(resultObserver.movedNode.itemId, bm2Id);
>
> // nsINavHistoryResultObserver.nodeRemoved
> - PlacesUtils.bookmarks.removeItem(testBookmark2);
> - do_check_eq(testBookmark2, resultObserver.removedNode.itemId);
> + await PlacesUtils.bookmarks.remove(testBookmark2.guid);
> + do_check_eq(bm2Id, resultObserver.removedNode.itemId);
ditto
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_onItemChanged_tags.js:18
(Diff revision 1)
> - PlacesUtils.bookmarks.DEFAULT_INDEX, "Bookmark 1"
> - );
> + url: uri,
> + title: "Bookmark 1"
> + });
> PlacesUtils.tagging.tagURI(uri, tags);
>
> + let id = await PlacesUtils.promiseItemId(bookmark.guid);
we should add the missing arguments to the observer methods and compare guids instead.
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_onItemChanged_tags.js:20
(Diff revision 1)
> + });
> PlacesUtils.tagging.tagURI(uri, tags);
>
> + let id = await PlacesUtils.promiseItemId(bookmark.guid);
> +
> + let promise = Promise.defer();
PromiseUtils.defer() or new Promise()
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_pageGuid_bookmarkGuid.js:35
(Diff revision 1)
> + }]
> + });
>
> - let root = PlacesUtils.getFolderContents(folder).root;
> + let folderId = await PlacesUtils.promiseItemId(bookmarks[0].guid);
> +
> + let root = PlacesUtils.getFolderContents(folderId).root;
We should probably file a bug to make getFolderContents accept a guid and do the promiseItemId internally (for now, then when we will fix bug 824502 the problem will go away).
Attachment #8881187 -
Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8881271 [details]
Bug 1376234 - Convert more xpcshell-tests in toolkit/components/places/tests/unit to async Bookmarks.jsm API.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/152480/#review157786
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_utils_getURLsForContainerNode.js:17
(Diff revision 1)
> -var bs = PU.bookmarks;
>
> -var tests = [
>
> -function() {
> +add_task(async function test_getURLsForContainerNode_folder() {
> dump("\n\n*** TEST: folder\n");
please replace all the dump( with do_print( in this test
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_utils_getURLsForContainerNode.js:78
(Diff revision 1)
> + }]
> + }],
> + });
>
> var query = hs.getNewQuery();
> - query.setFolders([bs.toolbarFolder], 1);
> + query.setFolders([PlacesUtils.bookmarks.toolbarFolder], 1);
PlacesUtils.toolbarFolderId (the difference is mostly that this is a lazy getter that needs to cross XPCOM just once).
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_utils_getURLsForContainerNode.js:121
(Diff revision 1)
> + }]
> + }],
> + });
>
> var query = hs.getNewQuery();
> - query.setFolders([bs.toolbarFolder], 1);
> + query.setFolders([PlacesUtils.bookmarks.toolbarFolder], 1);
ditto
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_utils_getURLsForContainerNode.js:163
(Diff revision 1)
> + }]
> + }],
> + });
>
> var query = hs.getNewQuery();
> - query.setFolders([bs.toolbarFolder], 1);
> + query.setFolders([PlacesUtils.bookmarks.toolbarFolder], 1);
ditto
::: toolkit/components/places/tests/unit/test_utils_getURLsForContainerNode.js:206
(Diff revision 1)
> + }]
> + }],
> + });
>
> var query = hs.getNewQuery();
> - query.setFolders([bs.toolbarFolder], 1);
> + query.setFolders([PlacesUtils.bookmarks.toolbarFolder], 1);
ditto
Attachment #8881271 -
Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment on attachment 8881187 [details]
Bug 1376234 - Convert some xpcshell-tests in toolkit/components/places/tests/unit to async Bookmarks.jsm API.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/152460/#review157766
> Is there a newline at EOF here per coding style? mozreview is not able to tell me that and I don't recall if we have eslint for that.
There is a newline, my editor was removing double-newlines. We do have an eslint rule to check there's one.
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Pushed by mbanner@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/4a24d60bca74
Convert some xpcshell-tests in toolkit/components/places/tests/unit to async Bookmarks.jsm API. r=mak
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/d1382e1bc996
Convert more xpcshell-tests in toolkit/components/places/tests/unit to async Bookmarks.jsm API. r=mak
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/4a24d60bca74
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d1382e1bc996
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
status-firefox56:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla56
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•