Closed Bug 1383323 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

radial-gradient(circle gold,red) must not work (missing comma)

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: moz, Assigned: dholbert)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete, testcase)

Attachments

(2 files)

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0 A gradient like background-image: radial-gradient(circle gold,red); works in Gecko. Must not work because of missing comma after "circle". It doesn't work in Chrome (and most likely other browsers).
Attached file testcase
Keywords: testcase
Hmm, works as expected with Stylo enabled, so should I close this bug?
Let's track this as a stylo behavior change.
Xidorn, is it worth fixing Gecko here?
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
I don't think it's worth fixing Gecko given that we accept and only document the correct syntax, and it doesn't work in other browsers. Let's just track it as a stylo behavior change.
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
I've reported this difference in the MDN reference pages, as I think it is worth knowing about. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/radial-gradient#Stylo_notes https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/57#Stylo_notes
Priority: -- → P3
So fixed with Stylo, right?
(In reply to Kuba Niewiarowski from comment #7) > So fixed with Stylo, right? Yes.
Given that Stylo fixes this, I don't think we should bother trying to fix this in Gecko (since the Gecko fix likely wouldn't ship until Gecko's style system is unsupported anyway). I've posted a patch that just adds this bug's testcase as a mochitest (with the expectation that it's rejected by Stylo, but accepted by Gecko).
Comment on attachment 8912432 [details] Bug 1383323: Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/183758/#review188962 ::: layout/style/test/property_database.js:510 (Diff revision 1) > +// (Note: this isn't technically a "property-enabling pref", so we're slightly > +// abusing "IsCSSPropertyPrefEnabled" here. But it's OK; the point is that > +// we have different expectations depending on whether the pref is enabled. > +// *And*, we want to be alerted if the pref is removed entirely.) > +if (IsCSSPropertyPrefEnabled("layout.css.servo.enabled")) { Probably just use `SpecialPowers.DOMWindowUtils.isStyledByServo` instead.
Attachment #8912432 - Flags: review?(xidorn+moz) → review+
Comment on attachment 8912432 [details] Bug 1383323: Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/183758/#review188962 > Probably just use `SpecialPowers.DOMWindowUtils.isStyledByServo` instead. I think I prefer IsCSSPropertyPrefEnabled, because it gives us the benefit that it's guaranteed to trigger a test failure as soon as the pref is removed (which will remind us to merge this list into the actual main list, which we should do at that point if not sooner). Maybe SpecialPowers.DOMWindowUtils.isStyledByServo would also trigger a test failure at that point in time (e.g. if that API were ripped out simultaneously to the pref being removed), but I don't know that for sure. Is that OK with you? (Maybe SpecialPowers.DOMWindowUtils.isStyledByServo is better for reasons I'm unaware of?)
Comment on attachment 8912432 [details] Bug 1383323: Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/183758/#review188966 ::: layout/style/test/property_database.js:515 (Diff revision 1) > + Array.prototype.push.apply(invalidGradientAndElementValues, > + gradientsNewlyRejectedInStylo); It is probably clearer to do ```javascript invalidGradientAndElementValues.push(...gradientsNewlyRejectedInStylo); ```
Comment on attachment 8912432 [details] Bug 1383323: Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/183758/#review188968 ::: layout/style/test/property_database.js:515 (Diff revision 1) > + Array.prototype.push.apply(invalidGradientAndElementValues, > + gradientsNewlyRejectedInStylo); Thanks, I'll do this. Clearly my modern-JS knowledge is lacking. :) (I cribbed this code from https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/push#Merging_two_arrays , BTW).
Comment on attachment 8912432 [details] Bug 1383323: Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/183758/#review188962 > I think I prefer IsCSSPropertyPrefEnabled, because it gives us the benefit that it's guaranteed to trigger a test failure as soon as the pref is removed (which will remind us to merge this list into the actual main list, which we should do at that point if not sooner). > > Maybe SpecialPowers.DOMWindowUtils.isStyledByServo would also trigger a test failure at that point in time (e.g. if that API were ripped out simultaneously to the pref being removed), but I don't know that for sure. > > Is that OK with you? (Maybe SpecialPowers.DOMWindowUtils.isStyledByServo is better for reasons I'm unaware of?) `isStyledByServo` detects the actual backend used in the document, which has both pros and cons. There are cases where a document can be styled by gecko backend even when the pref of stylo is enabled, which means checking pref can lead to wrong result, but it also means that if stylo is silently disabled internally, no one would notice. In my mind, `isStyledByServo` should be removed at the same time when we remove the old style system (and the pref), so I don't think that is a problem. I would probably prefer we have one unified mechanism to check stylo backend rather than check pref at some places while using the internal property at other places.
Comment on attachment 8912432 [details] Bug 1383323: Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/183758/#review188968 > Thanks, I'll do this. Clearly my modern-JS knowledge is lacking. :) > > (I cribbed this code from https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/push#Merging_two_arrays , BTW). I'm not super familiar with that either... I thought there should be some modern syntax for that, but it also took me a while to figure out what that is.
Pushed by dholbert@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/fd98557b7d2a Add a property_database.js testcase to verify that we reject radial-gradient() expressions that lack comma between shape and first color (iff stylo is enabled). r=xidorn
Resolving as fixed by stylo. (Can't actually put stylo in depends-on field because that'd create a cycle, so I'll put it in the blocks field, so it's connected at least.)
Blocks: stylo
Flags: in-testsuite+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee: nobody → dholbert
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: