Closed
Bug 1385558
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Tinderbox builds isn't being updated
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: mp3geek, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0 Build ID: 20170726043022 Steps to reproduce: Often manually download the latest Firefox builds from https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/tinderbox-builds/mozilla-central-win64-pgo/ Actual results: No updates since 26-Jul-2017 13:34 Also applicable for 32bit builds. Expected results: Would like the return of tinderbox builds
![]() |
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → General Automation
Product: Firefox → Release Engineering
QA Contact: catlee
Version: 56 Branch → ---
Not to push, but can we get a fix for the regular tinderbox builds?
Plus unbranded builds are missing https://queue.taskcluster.net/v1/task/PQysjCErReaYKGFbQxJQDw/artifacts/public/build/ and linux x86 unbranded builds too. Both of these are important for extension testing and private testing (on stable n beta code)
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to mdew from comment #0) > Often manually download the latest Firefox builds from > https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/tinderbox-builds/mozilla-central-win64- > pgo/ After migrating to Taskcluster, tinderbox-builds is no longer being updated with per-checkin builds. The proper place to fetch per-checkin builds is from the Taskcluster index. e.g. https://tools.taskcluster.net/index/artifacts/gecko.v2.mozilla-central.latest.firefox/win64-pgo (In reply to hulmelo from comment #3) > Plus unbranded builds are missing > > https://queue.taskcluster.net/v1/task/PQysjCErReaYKGFbQxJQDw/artifacts/ > public/build/ > > and linux x86 unbranded builds too. > > Both of these are important for extension testing and private testing (on > stable n beta code) This is unrelated. Please see bugs 1391283 and 1393071.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
Shouldn't this technically be marked "WONTFIX"?
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•