Closed
Bug 1386174
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
optgroup label ignores background-color in DevFox only
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1388682
People
(Reporter: harry.auer, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 Build ID: 20170727114534 Steps to reproduce: setting css property `background-color´ (some shade of blue) to proper placed OPTGROUP element. Actual results: Developer tools show up that the defined background-color is the used color, but the color is only correct in Firefox 54.0.1 (64-Bit). DevFox 55.0b13 (64-bit) uses some light-grey background-color! Unfortunately with (my?) white foreground color. This is not specific to the version numbers above, since it is reproducible with earlier version though. Expected results: DevFox should provide identical output as Firefox does!!? Don't they render the same!?
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
this is how it is (and should be) shown by firefox.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8892357 [details]
devfox.jpg
this is how it is shown (wrongly) in DevFox
likely a duplicate of bug 1388682. If so, should be fixed in Fx 55.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
This is not solved yet - please reopen and fix this.
Firefox 77.0.1 still ignores background-color for optgroup.
See here as an example: https://arnowelzel.de/en/tools/spoke-length-calculator
In dark modes this is even more annoying since for dark mode I have defined dark background colors - and that does not work with Firefox, only with Chromium based browsers.
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
Please file a new bug for that, with an screenshot if possible. This bug was closed 3 years ago and it's probably not the same root cause as this.
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
There seems to be a newer bug report already: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1394491
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•