Closed
Bug 1386272
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Create a module to recommend webextensions addons from legacy extensions
Categories
(Data Platform and Tools :: General, enhancement)
Data Platform and Tools
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: Dexter, Unassigned)
References
Details
We need to create a TAAR module that recommends webextension addons if user has legacy addons.
[1] - https://github.com/mozilla/taar
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
I helped create the following add-ons (the first uses XPCOM and the second uses WebExtensions):
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pagesaver/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pagesaver-we/
The logical upgrade path is for users to switch to our WE addon, but because we did not want to "cut off" people who rely on some of the features of the old XPCOM add-on, we used a different extension ID for the new one.
Will there a be a way for add-on authors to link their own WE variant to their old XPCOM add-on so that Firefox can make an appropriate recommendation?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Smith (:mcs) from comment #1)
> I helped create the following add-ons (the first uses XPCOM and the second
> uses WebExtensions):
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pagesaver/
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pagesaver-we/
>
> The logical upgrade path is for users to switch to our WE addon, but because
> we did not want to "cut off" people who rely on some of the features of the
> old XPCOM add-on, we used a different extension ID for the new one.
Hi Mark, thanks for commenting here!
This bug is about writing the code for the recommendation model, which is being studied in bug 1386629.
Regardless of the model or technique we will end up using, I can tell you that we will leverage the information that is already available on AMO (we're not part of the AMO team) [1].
> Will there a be a way for add-on authors to link their own WE variant to
> their old XPCOM add-on so that Firefox can make an appropriate
> recommendation?
That's a good question! Unfortunately I don't know how to answer that, it has to do more with the AMO team rather than us. Maybe this question is better answered by the addons-server team [2]?
[1] - http://addons-server.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/api/addons.html#search
[2] - https://github.com/mozilla/addons-server
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alessio Placitelli [:Dexter] from comment #2)
> (In reply to Mark Smith (:mcs) from comment #1)
> > Will there a be a way for add-on authors to link their own WE variant to
> > their old XPCOM add-on so that Firefox can make an appropriate
> > recommendation?
>
> That's a good question! Unfortunately I don't know how to answer that, it
> has to do more with the AMO team rather than us. Maybe this question is
> better answered by the addons-server team [2]?
>
> [1] -
> http://addons-server.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/api/addons.html#search
> [2] - https://github.com/mozilla/addons-server
In case someone else finds this bug and has the same question, the answer seems to be "only AMO editors will be able to affect the recommendations." There is a discourse thread where everyone can make suggestions though: https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/favorite-webextensions/17087/3
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
This happened in https://github.com/mozilla/taar/pull/22
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
Moved to new component, per bug 1425844.
Component: General → Add-on Recommender
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Component: Add-on Recommender → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•