Closed
Bug 1388247
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Label PCookieServiceChild
Categories
(Core :: Networking: Cookies, enhancement, P3)
Core
Networking: Cookies
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
mozilla57
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox57 | --- | fix-optional |
People
(Reporter: kershaw, Assigned: kershaw)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.75 KB,
patch
|
kershaw
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Since we have bug 1331680 landed, we now have lots of runnables in PCookieServiceChild need to be labeled.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → kechang
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [necko-active]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Since CookieServiceChild is shared for all documents in the same content process, it seems we can only label CookieServiceChild as SystemGroup.
Josh, please take a look. Thanks.
Attachment #8897317 -
Flags: review?(josh)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8897317 -
Flags: review?(josh) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Carry r+.
Attachment #8897317 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8897748 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Pushed by ryanvm@gmail.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/6761e3cfd323
Use SystemGroup to label PCookieServiceChild. r=jdm
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla57
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Reopen because this was rolled back per bug 1398420 comment 0.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Bulk priority update: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1399258
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
Marking as fix-optional for 57, still nice to have it if we found a good way to fix it.
Whiteboard: [necko-active]
Updated•7 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [necko-triaged]
Updated•7 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P3
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
Farre, do we still care about labeling IPC methods?
Flags: needinfo?(afarre)
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
The only user of the labels (that I know of) is about:performance, and that only ever care about DocGroups and not SystemGroups, so this patch should be safe to drop.
Flags: needinfo?(afarre)
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
Based on comment 11, we can close this bug.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago → 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•