Closed
Bug 1393054
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Awesome bar hover state (border, box-shadow) should be consistent with back button
Categories
(Firefox :: General, enhancement, P1)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox57 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: epang, Assigned: daleharvey)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [reserve-photon-visual])
Attachments
(2 files)
Currently the hover state state of the awesome bar is slightly darker then the back button. Can we update and align the stroke and drop shadow to the back button specifications?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Blocks: photon-visual
Priority: -- → P4
Summary: Awesome bar hover state should be consistent with back button → Awesome bar hover state (border, box-shadow) should be consistent with back button
Whiteboard: [photon-visual] [triage] → [reserve-photon-visual]
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dharvey
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Iteration: --- → 57.3 - Sep 19
Flags: qe-verify?
Priority: P4 → P1
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
I specifically set that box shadow in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1352366 however I cant remember why, its not in the spec and not mentioned in the comments as far as I can see. Thats the only difference between the url bar and the back button, they otherwise match the spec
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8903686 [details] Bug 1393054 - Remove extra box-shadow from urlbar. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/175408/#review180702
Attachment #8903686 -
Flags: review?(dao+bmo) → review+
Pushed by dgottwald@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/7c4c81a8b699 Remove extra box-shadow from urlbar. r=dao
![]() |
||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7c4c81a8b699
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 57
Updated•6 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify? → qe-verify+
QA Contact: ovidiu.boca
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
I verify this issue on Windows 10 x64 using Nightly 58.0a1 with build ID 20171001220301 and the conclusion was that the hover state of the awesome bar, the color is darker (#F0F0F0) than the build with the old version of 2017.08.24 (#F2F2F2). This is the result you are expecting?
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
I tested this problem using Nightly 58.0a1 with the build ID 20171002100134 on Windows 10 x64 and Windows 7 x64 and I see no difference, but on Mac OS 10.12 and Ubuntu 16.04, the problem is resolved.
Flags: needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
Sorry, about my mistake! Please ignore this comment.
Flags: needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Valentina Claudia Ona from comment #6) > I verify this issue on Windows 10 x64 using Nightly 58.0a1 with build ID > 20171001220301 and the conclusion was that the hover state of the awesome > bar, the color is darker (#F0F0F0) than the build with the old version of > 2017.08.24 (#F2F2F2). > This is the result you are expecting? No, the location bar's hover box-shadow was darker, should be lighter now to match the back button.
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
I tested on Mac OS X 10.10 with a build before the fix and with the latest Nightly build 58.0a1(2017-10-03) and I don't see any differences. Eric, can you please give us more details about this issue, on what OS did you encounter this issue and other details that can help us verify this. Thanks
Flags: needinfo?(epang)
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
Hi Ovidiu, it was a subtle change but it looks good now. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(epang)
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
Thanks Eric for your reply, can you please tell me on what FF version did you test this, I assume FF Nightly 58.0a1. But just to be on the same page we would appreciate if you can make a screen recorder or a print screen to see how to verify this issue. Thanks
Flags: needinfo?(epang)
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Since Eric reported the bug, I think his word is good enough to mark this verified. Thanks!
Updated•6 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•