Closed
Bug 1393639
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
56.0b6 busted linux indexes - post-wv
Categories
(Release Engineering :: Release Automation: Other, enhancement)
Release Engineering
Release Automation: Other
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: mozilla)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
nthomas
:
review+
mozilla
:
checked-in-
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
nthomas
:
review+
|
Details |
2.07 KB,
patch
|
nthomas
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
3.55 KB,
patch
|
nthomas
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
.
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
I essentially copied the macosx64 indexes and s,macosx64,linux, or linux64. I spot checked the indexes, e.g. https://tools.taskcluster.net/index/gecko.v2.mozilla-beta.revision.43ec1d3bcf437875c2ce72e9f44cbc893afe9314.firefox-l10n.linux-devedition-nightly-repackage.en-US -- they appear good. We need to land this (and merge?), update bm85, and trigger a build 2.
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8900955 [details] bug 1393639 - fix tc indexes for linux. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/172408/#review177686 lgtm
Attachment #8900955 -
Flags: review?(nthomas) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
https://github.com/mozilla-releng/releasetasks/pull/268
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8900976 [details] bug 1393639 - adjust relpro beetmover for linux repackage. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/172426/#review177692
Attachment #8900976 -
Flags: review?(nthomas) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8900955 [details] bug 1393639 - fix tc indexes for linux. Backed out; we need to reland when we're ready.
Attachment #8900955 -
Flags: checked-in-
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
Rail: can you think of anything else we'd have to change to add linux repackage and repackage-signing?
Flags: needinfo?(rail)
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
https://dxr.mozilla.org/build-central/source/tools/lib/python/kickoff/__init__.py#153-241 may need some change too.
Flags: needinfo?(rail)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
I think those are ok, since repackage + repackage-signing on linux only deal with the complete mar file.
Comment 11•7 years ago
|
||
Pushed by asasaki@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ac212f954aa8 adjust relpro beetmover for linux repackage. r=nthomas
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•7 years ago
|
||
Relanded: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/a933f4ce887f https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/9097842054e4 https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ac212f954aa8 https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/31419edb38f8 https://github.com/mozilla-releng/releasetasks/commit/b7c666cc51f4b11270de43263789df62aba61534 Updating bm85...
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 13•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ac212f954aa8
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•7 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8902021 -
Flags: review?(nthomas)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•7 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8902021 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8902021 -
Flags: review?(nthomas)
Attachment #8902028 -
Flags: review?(nthomas)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8902028 -
Flags: review?(nthomas) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•7 years ago
|
||
Specifying the repackage index means we trigger beetmover script runs for the repackage files, and we have no repackage files to beetmove. Linux repackage only creates the unsigned complete mar. We can ignore it, like we do for windows.
Attachment #8902059 -
Flags: review?(nthomas)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8902059 -
Flags: review?(nthomas) → review+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•