Closed
Bug 1394127
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Zilla Slab not used for rendering
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: mkohler, Unassigned)
Details
With today's Nightly (also yesterday's Nightly), in the following testcase the "Zilla Slab" font is not used to render to heading, even though it gets downloaded. It works perfectly well in Release with the same testcase.
https://michaelkohler.github.io/bug-testcases/2017-08-26_nightly-google-font-zillaslab.html
Additionally, when I download the font and use @font-face to embed it, it works perfectly fine. Might be a Google Fonts problem, however, downloading the same font from Google Fonts and use it with @font-face, it works as well.
Setting layout.css.servo.enabled to false does not change anything.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
OS: Unspecified → Mac OS X
Hardware: Unspecified → x86_64
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Jet -- let me know if this was the wrong component.
Component: General → CSS Parsing and Computation
Flags: needinfo?(bugs)
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
The test file returns the following errors in the console:
Blocked loading mixed active content “http://www.sfgate.com/css/hdn/fonts/sofia/SofiaProBold-webfont.woff”
Blocked loading mixed active content “http://www.sfgate.com/css/hdn/fonts/league-gothic/league_gothic-webfont.woff”
Blocked loading mixed active content “http://searchfox.org/static/fonts/icons.woff?2013”
Blocked loading mixed active content “http://www.sfgate.com/css/hdn/fonts/euclid/EuclidFlex-Bold-WebXL.woff”
Note that the above are URLs for web fonts from pages in other browser tabs ^ and not the expected font URLs used by the CSS:
/* latin-ext */
@font-face {
font-family: 'Zilla Slab';
font-style: normal;
font-weight: 400;
src: local('Zilla Slab'), local('ZillaSlab-Regular'), url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/zillaslab/v2/Rqj61QmcYU88jfBZybBYtQsYbbCjybiHxArTLjt7FRU.woff2) format('woff2');
unicode-range: U+0100-024F, U+1E00-1EFF, U+20A0-20AB, U+20AD-20CF, U+2C60-2C7F, U+A720-A7FF;
}
Jonathan: is this a font or networking issue? Thx!
Flags: needinfo?(bugs) → needinfo?(jfkthame)
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
Strange.... I can't seem to reproduce the problem here. On the testcase, the Zilla fonts appear fine for me.
(The issue sounds very much like the known Google Fonts subsetting bug, whereby they would often serve invalid resources for subsetted fonts; on Nightly, we validate and reject those resources, while on Release we are more forgiving and allow them to load. But in this case I can't reproduce the failure, even though validation is enabled.)
There may have been some recent fixes in this area on the Google Fonts side; are you still seeing the problem currently?
Flags: needinfo?(jfkthame) → needinfo?(me)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
No, I can't reproduce this anymore, neither in today's Nightly nor in the Nightly I reported it for. Seems like this was fixed on Google's side.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(me)
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•