Closed Bug 1397312 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

CCADB entries generated 2017-09-06T16:07:44Z

Categories

(Core :: Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State, enhancement, P2)

enhancement

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mgoodwin, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

No description provided.
Revocation data for new records
Attachment #8905076 - Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Attachment #8905076 - Flags: review?(kwilson)
Attached file revocations.txt (obsolete) —
Attachment #8905077 - Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL, but would it be possible to also add the entries for Bug #1393281 and Bug #1394595 in this batch?
Flags: needinfo?(mgoodwin)
These three entries look fine: Results: Pending Kinto Dataset (Found): 471 Added Entries (Expected): 3 [GOOD] Expected But Not Pending (Not Found): 0 Deleted: 0 [GOOD] Entries In Production But Lost Without Being Deleted (Missing): 0 [GOOD] The Kinto dataset found at production equals the union of the expected file and the live list. Nothing not found. Nothing deleted.
(In reply to Kathleen Wilson from comment #3) > These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL, but would it be possible to > also add the entries for Bug #1393281 and Bug #1394595 in this batch? Sure, that's no problem.
Flags: needinfo?(mgoodwin)
(In reply to Mark Goodwin [:mgoodwin] from comment #5) > (In reply to Kathleen Wilson from comment #3) > > These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL, but would it be possible to > > also add the entries for Bug #1393281 and Bug #1394595 in this batch? > See also the attachment for bug 1397796. I'll combine the revocations.txt entries in this bug so Matt needs only test once.
This is a revocations.txt containing entries for both this bug and bug 1397796
Attachment #8905077 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8905077 - Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Attachment #8905563 - Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Depends on: 1397796
Comment on attachment 8905076 [details] Intermediates to be revoked These are the correct entries to add. Thanks!
Attachment #8905076 - Flags: review?(kwilson) → review+
Attachment #8905076 - Flags: review?(mwobensmith) → review+
Comment on attachment 8905563 [details] revocations_1397312.txt TLS Canary ran ~460k top sites with no errors due to this change.
Attachment #8905563 - Flags: review?(mwobensmith) → review+
Assigning priorities to all blocklisting bugs because reasons.
Priority: -- → P2
Signed. Ready for verification.
I confirm that these entries have been added to OneCRL. Thanks!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

Moving bug to Core::Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State.

Component: Blocklist Policy Requests → Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State
Product: Toolkit → Core
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: