Closed
Bug 1397312
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
CCADB entries generated 2017-09-06T16:07:44Z
Categories
(Core :: Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State, enhancement, P2)
Core
Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mgoodwin, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Revocation data for new records
Attachment #8905076 -
Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Attachment #8905076 -
Flags: review?(kwilson)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8905077 -
Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL, but would it be possible to also add the entries for Bug #1393281 and Bug #1394595 in this batch?
Flags: needinfo?(mgoodwin)
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
These three entries look fine:
Results:
Pending Kinto Dataset (Found): 471
Added Entries (Expected): 3
[GOOD] Expected But Not Pending (Not Found): 0
Deleted: 0
[GOOD] Entries In Production But Lost Without Being Deleted (Missing): 0
[GOOD] The Kinto dataset found at production equals the union of the expected file and the live list.
Nothing not found.
Nothing deleted.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kathleen Wilson from comment #3)
> These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL, but would it be possible to
> also add the entries for Bug #1393281 and Bug #1394595 in this batch?
Sure, that's no problem.
Flags: needinfo?(mgoodwin)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Goodwin [:mgoodwin] from comment #5)
> (In reply to Kathleen Wilson from comment #3)
> > These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL, but would it be possible to
> > also add the entries for Bug #1393281 and Bug #1394595 in this batch?
>
See also the attachment for bug 1397796. I'll combine the revocations.txt entries in this bug so Matt needs only test once.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
This is a revocations.txt containing entries for both this bug and bug 1397796
Attachment #8905077 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8905077 -
Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Attachment #8905563 -
Flags: review?(mwobensmith)
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8905076 [details]
Intermediates to be revoked
These are the correct entries to add. Thanks!
Attachment #8905076 -
Flags: review?(kwilson) → review+
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8905076 -
Flags: review?(mwobensmith) → review+
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8905563 [details]
revocations_1397312.txt
TLS Canary ran ~460k top sites with no errors due to this change.
Attachment #8905563 -
Flags: review?(mwobensmith) → review+
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
Assigning priorities to all blocklisting bugs because reasons.
Priority: -- → P2
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
Signed. Ready for verification.
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
I confirm that these entries have been added to OneCRL.
Thanks!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 13•4 years ago
|
||
Moving bug to Core::Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State.
Component: Blocklist Policy Requests → Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State
Product: Toolkit → Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•