Closed Bug 140895 Opened 22 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Feedback: Networking QA Home page

Categories

(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: benc, Assigned: benc)

References

()

Details

This bug is for tracking feedback and suggestions for this page.
I shouldn't be a necko QA contact for anything...

You need to split out OPEN bugs form RESOLVED-but-not-VERIFIED, so that the
counts are vaguely accurate.
I'll do a search-and-destroy for any bugs that you are qa assigned. 

The approach was to start from the very top of the bug totals and go downward. I
invented the term "Open" to measure total amount of work needed. I'll be trying
to create query categories that are more task/role oriented soon. 

Blocks: 109332
page is not linked from http://www.mozilla.org/quality/
can you also reformat the page to be more consistent w/ other QA home pages?
I'm trying to keep more status and current info on this page. That is not what I
would say is the typical Netscape QA style of operating, but it has worked well
for me thus far.

This page is pretty consistenly updated, and has this format because I found the
other QA pages were good as indexes, but were not really current or relevant.

If you want to suggest a re-write, I'd be glad to get suggestions. If you feel
there is a serious consistency problem, someone on mozilla staff needs to tell
me to get in line. 

I'm seriously busy (see that row of bug totals at the top?), because I used to
share that w/ someone, now it's just me.

re #1: bradley - I've begun to consider doing that. Before I wanted to reflect
bug totals, but now I care more about my verification list and less about the
unfixed bug count. But I was trying to run as few regular queries as possible,
so that was the original compromise.
QA Contact: imajes → stolenclover
Hmm, the page was last updated 2003-12-12 05:32. I guess I can make the page
match the mozilla.org Markup Reference and Styleguide if you like.
Please do!
Done. Do we still need this bug? Users can file bugs themselves if they think
that page is not good.
I like to keep the feedback loop ope. It is sort of a home page for the work I
have been doing. In the past, I have found, on other pages I maintain, that this
gets more feedback than assuming readers know they can file in bugzilla. It also
keeps the number of doc bugs lower.
QA Contact: danielwang → www-mozilla-org
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
This content has recently been archived.  If this needs to be migrated back to a production site, I'd recommend posting it on QMO or MDC.  Closing as wontfix.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
RIP.

I haven't been able to updated it for some time. I'm going to be spending the little time I have on doing MDC documentation, and less QA.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.