Closed
Bug 140895
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Feedback: Networking QA Home page
Categories
(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
www.mozilla.org
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: benc, Assigned: benc)
References
()
Details
This bug is for tracking feedback and suggestions for this page.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
I shouldn't be a necko QA contact for anything...
You need to split out OPEN bugs form RESOLVED-but-not-VERIFIED, so that the
counts are vaguely accurate.
I'll do a search-and-destroy for any bugs that you are qa assigned.
The approach was to start from the very top of the bug totals and go downward. I
invented the term "Open" to measure total amount of work needed. I'll be trying
to create query categories that are more task/role oriented soon.
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
page is not linked from http://www.mozilla.org/quality/
can you also reformat the page to be more consistent w/ other QA home pages?
I'm trying to keep more status and current info on this page. That is not what I
would say is the typical Netscape QA style of operating, but it has worked well
for me thus far.
This page is pretty consistenly updated, and has this format because I found the
other QA pages were good as indexes, but were not really current or relevant.
If you want to suggest a re-write, I'd be glad to get suggestions. If you feel
there is a serious consistency problem, someone on mozilla staff needs to tell
me to get in line.
I'm seriously busy (see that row of bug totals at the top?), because I used to
share that w/ someone, now it's just me.
re #1: bradley - I've begun to consider doing that. Before I wanted to reflect
bug totals, but now I care more about my verification list and less about the
unfixed bug count. But I was trying to run as few regular queries as possible,
so that was the original compromise.
Updated•21 years ago
|
QA Contact: imajes → stolenclover
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Hmm, the page was last updated 2003-12-12 05:32. I guess I can make the page
match the mozilla.org Markup Reference and Styleguide if you like.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Done. Do we still need this bug? Users can file bugs themselves if they think
that page is not good.
I like to keep the feedback loop ope. It is sort of a home page for the work I
have been doing. In the past, I have found, on other pages I maintain, that this
gets more feedback than assuming readers know they can file in bugzilla. It also
keeps the number of doc bugs lower.
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: danielwang → www-mozilla-org
Updated•17 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
This content has recently been archived. If this needs to be migrated back to a production site, I'd recommend posting it on QMO or MDC. Closing as wontfix.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
RIP.
I haven't been able to updated it for some time. I'm going to be spending the little time I have on doing MDC documentation, and less QA.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•