Closed
Bug 1409752
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
The documentation for WebSocket.send() omits ArrayBufferView type
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: API: Web Sockets, enhancement, P5)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: guest271314, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
:: Developer Documentation Request
Request Type: Correction
Gecko Version: unspecified
Technical Contact:
:: Details
The documentation for WebSocket.send() omits ArrayBufferView type at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebSocket#send(), see https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/web-sockets.html#network
Hello,
"ArrayBufferView [1] - This is a helper type to simplify the specification, it isn't an interface and there are no objects implementing it".
So it probably doesn't make sense mentioning it there.
[1] - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ArrayBufferView
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Saurabh Nair [:jsx] (not reading bugmail. ni? if you need me) from comment #1)
> Hello,
>
> "ArrayBufferView [1] - This is a helper type to simplify the specification,
> it isn't an interface and there are no objects implementing it".
>
> So it probably doesn't make sense mentioning it there.
>
> [1] - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ArrayBufferView
There is no need to "simplify the specification" by omitting expected arguments to a method. That type of omission only leads to confusion https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46718355/sending-a-sub-segment-of-an-arraybuffer-over-a-websocket-without-copying/, not simplification.
Sorry, that was from my lack of understanding of ArrayBuffers. I'll leave it for someone else to update.
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Added.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•