Closed Bug 1414321 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

4.64 - 5.18% speedometer (linux64) regression on push e9349ad2f1f8fec862b1d2271d0d8f25ad0814d4 (Thu Nov 2 2017)

Categories

(Core :: Graphics, defect, P3)

53 Branch
defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla58
Tracking Status
firefox-esr52 --- unaffected
firefox56 --- unaffected
firefox57 --- unaffected
firefox58 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: jmaher, Assigned: rhunt)

References

Details

(Keywords: perf, regression, talos-regression, Whiteboard: [gfx-noted])

Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?changeset=e9349ad2f1f8fec862b1d2271d0d8f25ad0814d4 As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 5% speedometer summary linux64 pgo e10s 40.31 -> 38.22 5% speedometer summary linux64 opt e10s 34.28 -> 32.69 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=10328 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Running *** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! *** Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
this has a regression on speedometer- the benchmark that we used to compare firefox vs chrome, specifically on windows10, this regression is on linux- :rhunt, can you take a look at this?
Flags: needinfo?(rhunt)
The patches were backed out from central here [1] because of a test timeout. I'll still keep this in mind before trying to land again. BTW, I don't see a description for speedometer under [2], what are the units? What does 40.31 -> 38.22 mean? [1] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/28647c01f828 [2] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests
Flags: needinfo?(rhunt)
here is the main website for speedometer: http://browserbench.org/Speedometer/ and on github: https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/tree/master/PerformanceTests/Speedometer I filed bug 1414331 to track describing the test, we will get that fixed soon. thanks for the heads up on the backout- I am happy to close this bug out, or leave it open if you wish to keep track of the regression until this lands again.
(In reply to Joel Maher ( :jmaher) (UTC-5) from comment #3) > here is the main website for speedometer: > http://browserbench.org/Speedometer/ > > and on github: > https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/tree/master/PerformanceTests/Speedometer > > I filed bug 1414331 to track describing the test, we will get that fixed > soon. > > thanks for the heads up on the backout- I am happy to close this bug out, or > leave it open if you wish to keep track of the regression until this lands > again. Let's leave this open to keep track of the regression before I try and land it again. Thanks!
Component: Untriaged → Graphics
Product: Firefox → Core
Is this really for speedometer v1 and not v2 like we use on awfy? Comment 3 does not point to the same versions we use on awfy.
I believe we have the latest version in talos, we use what is in-tree: http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/third_party/webkit/PerformanceTests/Speedometer
Priority: -- → P3
Whiteboard: [gfx-noted]
Be aware that new regressions have showed up for this bug: == Change summary for alert #10328 (as of Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:30:42 GMT) == Regressions: 85% tsvgx summary linux64 pgo e10s 355.97 -> 660.14 81% tsvgx summary linux64 opt e10s 376.70 -> 681.25 31% tscrollx summary windows10-64 opt e10s2.42 -> 3.17 31% tscrollx summary windows10-64 pgo e10s2.39 -> 3.14 18% tsvgx summary windows10-64 opt e10s237.67 -> 279.47 17% tsvgx summary windows10-64 pgo e10s220.68 -> 259.12 9% tscrollx summary linux64 opt e10s 6.57 -> 7.18 8% tscrollx summary linux64 pgo e10s 6.35 -> 6.88 7% tart summary linux64 pgo e10s 4.62 -> 4.96 6% tart summary linux64 opt e10s 5.17 -> 5.49 2% kraken summary linux64 pgo e10s 1,376.70 -> 1,407.88 2% kraken summary linux64 opt e10s 1,418.48 -> 1,450.34 For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=10328
Of course, these regressions were canceled by the backout. Comment 7 is just FYI.
(setting 58 to unaffected since this was backed out)
Bug 1399692 has landed in central again. I'm guessing if there are any talos regressions, they'll be opened in a new bug, so for now I'll close this.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee: nobody → rhunt
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla58
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.