Open Bug 1435798 (libdweb) Opened 7 years ago Updated 2 months ago

[meta] APIs for p2p web applications

Categories

(WebExtensions :: General, enhancement, P5)

enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: dietrich, Unassigned)

References

(Depends on 9 open bugs)

Details

(Keywords: meta)

Meta-bug for collecting the WebExtensions API features required for building p2p web applications.
Keywords: meta
Depends on: 1449171
Depends on: 1445924
Depends on: libdweb-dns-sd
Product: Toolkit → WebExtensions
Depends on: 1373640, 14328
Summary: APIs for p2p web applications → [meta] APIs for p2p web applications
Alias: p2p
Alias: p2p
Priority: -- → P5

Why does the github mirror for libdweb have to be archived? Aren't issues raised on github the same as bus here if you use a templates on github?

(In reply to willem from comment #1)

Why does the github mirror for libdweb have to be archived? Aren't issues raised on github the same as bus here if you use a templates on github?

Because code on github isn't actually a mirror, code in gecko is more of re-implementation inspired by code github & trying to keep two code bases in sync takes more time than it's worth. It is also that most issues raised can't be addressed in libdweb code base itself, it usually requires changes either in web extension code base or further down the stack in platform code base. Given that corresponding teams operate in bugzilla it's a lot more effective to report issues directly here as that it leaves me with more time to work on integrating libdweb as opposed to relaying issues back and forth.

Okay makes sense just feels weird posting a but when you just have a question.

Does Libdweb support mobile yet?

(In reply to willem from comment #3)

Okay makes sense just feels weird posting a but when you just have a question.

For general discussions we still have an #dweb IRC channel

Does Libdweb support mobile yet?

There had being no effort put into it, however sammacbeth who is frequently on that IRC channel made a version of beaker compatible dat browser with libdweb & https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/reference-browser

Is the p2p protocol effort has been abandoned? I've been monitoring the work for some time now and got to know some of the people working on it were let go. Just curious as to what's the future of this project.

Severity: normal → S3
a11y-review: requested → ---
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.