Closed
Bug 1436080
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Implement RsdparsaSdp::AddMediaSection method
Categories
(Core :: WebRTC: Signaling, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla62
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox62 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: dminor, Assigned: johannes.willbold)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
No description provided.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → johannes.willbold
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8986517 [details]
Bug 1436080: Implemented RsdparsaSdp::AddMediaSection,
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/251842/#review258296
lgtm!
::: media/webrtc/signaling/gtest/sdp_unittests.cpp:3995
(Diff revision 1)
> + ASSERT_EQ(3U, mSdp->GetMediaSectionCount())
> + << "Wrong number of media sections";
> +
> + mSdp->AddMediaSection(SdpMediaSection::kVideo,
> + SdpDirectionAttribute::Direction::kSendrecv,
> + 58000,SdpMediaSection::kUdpDtlsSctp,sdp::kIPv4,
nit: here and below please make sure you have a space after each comma in an argument list.
::: media/webrtc/signaling/gtest/sdp_unittests.cpp:4029
(Diff revision 1)
> + nextNewMediaSection.GetDirectionAttribute().mValue);
> + ASSERT_EQ(14006U,nextNewMediaSection.GetPort());
> + ASSERT_EQ(SdpMediaSection::kTcpTlsRtpSavpf,nextNewMediaSection.GetProtocol());
> + ASSERT_EQ(sdp::kIPv6,nextNewMediaSection.GetConnection().GetAddrType());
> + ASSERT_EQ("2607:f8b0:4004:801::2013",
> + nextNewMediaSection.GetConnection().GetAddress());
Please add some tests for invalid values to make sure the error is handled properly.
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/rsdparsa/src/lib.rs:21
(Diff revision 1)
> pub mod network;
> pub mod unsupported_types;
>
> use attribute_type::{SdpAttribute, SdpAttributeType, parse_attribute};
> use error::{SdpParserInternalError, SdpParserError};
> -use media_type::{SdpMedia, SdpMediaLine, parse_media, parse_media_vector};
> +use media_type::*;
Please list the types you use rather than using *.
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/rsdparsa/src/lib.rs:188
(Diff revision 1)
> pub fn has_media(&self) -> bool {
> !self.media.is_empty()
> }
> +
> + pub fn add_media(&mut self,media_type: SdpMediaValue, direction: SdpAttribute, port: u32,
> + protocol: SdpProtocolValue, addr: String)
nits: add whitespace after "self,", fix up indent
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/rsdparsa_capi/src/lib.rs:150
(Diff revision 1)
> +pub unsafe extern "C" fn sdp_add_media_section(session: *mut SdpSession,
> + media_type: u32, direction: u32,
> + port: u16, protocol: u32,
> + addr_type: u32, addr: StringView) -> nsresult {
> +
> + let addr_str:String = match addr.into(){
nit: space before {
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/rsdparsa_capi/src/lib.rs:158
(Diff revision 1)
> + println!("Error while pasing string, description: {:?}", (*boxed_error).description());
> + return NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG;
> + }
> + };
> +
> + let media_type = match media_type{
nit: space before {
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/rsdparsa_capi/src/lib.rs:190
(Diff revision 1)
> +
> + // Check that the provided address type is valid, the rust parser will find out
> + // on his own which address type was provided
> + match addr_type {
> + // enum AddrType { kAddrTypeNone, kIPv4, kIPv6 };
> + 1...2 => (),
Please add a comment explaining why you exclude kAddrTypeNone here. My first thought is that if it is a valid enumerated value, we should accept it.
::: media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/rsdparsa_capi/src/lib.rs:196
(Diff revision 1)
> + _ => {
> + return NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + match (*session).add_media(media_type,direction,port as u32,protocol,addr_str) {
nit: please add spaces after commas
Attachment #8986517 -
Flags: review?(dminor) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8986517 [details]
Bug 1436080: Implemented RsdparsaSdp::AddMediaSection,
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/251842/#review258296
> Please list the types you use rather than using *.
Fixed it. Although I think that this is very time consuming, as these lines have high merge conflict potential.
> Please add a comment explaining why you exclude kAddrTypeNone here. My first thought is that if it is a valid enumerated value, we should accept it.
I assumed that kAddrTypeNone is basically an 'invalid' flag. My asumption is based on this line: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/media/webrtc/signaling/src/sdp/SdpEnum.h#39
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Pushed by drno@ohlmeier.org:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/301f7d8a5ba2
Implemented RsdparsaSdp::AddMediaSection, r=dminor
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox62:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla62
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•