Closed Bug 1451124 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

write a WPT verifying workers get their own client ID

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Service Workers, enhancement, P2)

enhancement

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla61
Tracking Status
firefox61 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: bkelly, Assigned: bkelly)

References

(Blocks 2 open bugs)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

I have an interop report from a site related to worker client ID values. The site is expecting the chrome's behavior where FetchEvent.clientId values coming from a dedicated worker match the owning document's clientId. This is not correct given the current spec. In addition, it seems edge has matched chrome's non-spec behavior here. We should get a WPT establishing the correct spec behavior ASAP to prevent further interop issues in the future.
Priority: -- → P2
Andrew, this is a WPT test that verifies a dedicated worker has its own client ID and does not share its parent window's client ID. The spec requires the FetchEvent.clientId to be the id for the "request's client": https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-request-client I can't find where "request's client" is explicitly set, but things like step 1 here clearly expect it to hold worker clients, etc: https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#fetching https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=54cb31d450e1b2d4978aa4ae6b5ff2db1281bd4a
Attachment #8964697 - Flags: review?(bugmail)
Comment on attachment 8964697 [details] [diff] [review] Add a WPT test to verify dedicated workers have a separate client ID from their owning document. r=asuth Review of attachment 8964697 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: testing/web-platform/tests/service-workers/service-worker/worker-client-id.https.html @@ +34,5 @@ > + > +promise_test(async function(t) { > + const script = './resources/worker-client-id-worker.js'; > + const scope = './resources/worker-client-id'; > + const frame = scope + '/frame.html'; Per IRC discussion (thanks for clarifying!), please either explicitly add a comment that this is expected to 404 or respondWith an empty doc like you alternately proposed. Thanks!
Attachment #8964697 - Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Pushed by bkelly@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/aed7d4d9be32 Add a WPT test to verify dedicated workers have a separate client ID from their owning document. r=asuth
Yep, Chrome and Edge are wrong here. Thanks for creating a test.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla61
Safari also gets this wrong. Demo: https://worker-client-id-demo.glitch.me/
James, is the wpt sync bot operational at the moment? I was hoping to get this synced to the other browsers.
Flags: needinfo?(james)
It's hit a case it doesn't handle, which blocks subsequent upstreams. I'm already on it, hopefully it will be unblocked today.
Flags: needinfo?(james)
Created web-platform-tests PR https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/10418 for changes under testing/web-platform/tests
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: