Closed
Bug 1452373
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Don't allow multiple ServiceWorkerRegistrarSaveDataRunnable objects to execute at the same time
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Service Workers, enhancement, P2)
Core
DOM: Service Workers
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla61
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox61 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: bkelly, Assigned: bkelly)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 5 obsolete files)
20.58 KB,
patch
|
bkelly
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
When we adjust the ServiceWorkerRegistrar data we schedule a runnable to save to disk. The I/O is dispatched to StreamTransportService (STS):
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/2ce99e8054b0ff6ed1adf484aeaacacf2fea084c/dom/serviceworkers/ServiceWorkerRegistrar.cpp#825
STS is a thread pool. This means multiple runnables can get executed on different threads simultaneously. This could cause SaveData() to fail and trigger behavior like in bug 1450991.
We should use a TaskQueue to dispatch the ServiceWorkerRegistrarSaveDataRunnable objects. We also need to adjust the retry mechanism from bug 1450991.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8965974 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8965975 [details] [diff] [review]
P1 Make ServiceWorkerRegistrar use a TaskQueue to avoid overlapping IO runnables. r=asuth
I thought about this some more and I think it would be better to limit ourselves to one dispatched runnable at a time. This will deal with rapid state changes and effectively coallesce these changes into fewer writes.
Attachment #8965975 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
This needs some cleanup and a limit on retries, but I think it mostly does the right thing.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=b499f8ccfcd9dfb3e601adb29a4ba1dffc01084d
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8966370 -
Attachment description: bug1452373_onewriter.patch → Only allow one runnable to write to serviceworker.txt at a time. r=asuth
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Andrew, this makes ServiceWorkerRegistrar only dispatch a single runnable at a time to save data to disk. It uses time stamps to determine if new data has been received since it capture the data and a new save is needed. It also implements the retry mechanism from the PBackground thread at the same place. If shutdown occurs both saving again and retrying failed saves are bypassed.
I tested the retry mechanism locally by chown'ing serviceworker.txt to root ownership. I confirmed we only try to write the file 3 times before giving up. Reverting the file permissions allows us to write again on the next service worker change.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=9aac3e9a30f10052418bdc1ddf42c615ec5785f4
Attachment #8966370 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8966628 -
Flags: review?(bugmail)
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8966628 [details] [diff] [review]
Only allow one runnable to write to serviceworker.txt at a time. r=asuth
Review of attachment 8966628 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The core logic seems sound, but TimeStamp doesn't provide sufficient guarantees for `mDataTimeStamp <= mFileTimeStamp` to guarantee we don't suppress a mutation. But using a "generation" number that's incremented each time we mutate mData instead of overwriting with TimeStamp::Now() would. You already have the lock usage in-place, so this should be straightforward.
Attachment #8966628 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
Updated to use generation counts instead of time stamps. I deal with count wrapping by resetting the generations back to zero when they become in sync after a successful write. This makes it very unlikely we will wrap given we would need a uint32_t's worth of pending writes.
Note, I also added a comment about sketchy locking in ReadData(), but did not attempt to fix them here.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=8222d819af5304c2946bb2f002c41a0c6d6e214c
Attachment #8966628 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8966672 -
Flags: review?(bugmail)
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8966672 [details] [diff] [review]
Only allow one runnable to write to serviceworker.txt at a time. r=asuth
Review of attachment 8966672 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
It's grrrrreat!
::: dom/serviceworkers/ServiceWorkerRegistrar.cpp
@@ +880,5 @@
> + new ServiceWorkerRegistrarSaveDataRunnable(Move(data), generation);
> + nsresult rv = target->Dispatch(runnable.forget(), NS_DISPATCH_NORMAL);
> + NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS_VOID(rv);
> +
> + mRunnableDispatched = true;;
typo nit: s/;;/;/
Attachment #8966672 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8966672 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8966712 -
Flags: review+
Comment 11•7 years ago
|
||
Pushed by bkelly@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/19d7d934850c
Only allow one runnable to write to serviceworker.txt at a time. r=asuth
Comment 12•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox61:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla61
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•