Closed
Bug 1459734
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Update milestones and versions
Categories
(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: Administration, task)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: dylan, Assigned: dylan)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
This has been part of the release-tracking flags process recently, but this time it's a separate bug. I hope it is fully automated before next time.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
When you've a moment, check if I've missed any products?
Also, we still have yet to firmally establish which milestones should be disabled. it's all over the place depending on the product.
Flags: needinfo?(ehumphries)
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Milestone weren't up to date when merging. :RyanVM|afk
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Raul Gurzau (:RaulGurzau) from comment #4)
> Milestone weren't up to date when merging. :RyanVM|afk
In which product?
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
This is the merge: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-central&revision=59005ba3cd3e7b3f9e8804bea881bf4c3a755d7
The products are firefox, toolkit, core mostly.
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
They were there, but bugherder didn't use the firefox 62 milestone but the 61 one. It worked correctly for mozilla62. IIRC, that depends on the sort order of the milestones.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sebastian Hengst [:aryx][:archaeopteryx] (needinfo on intermittent or backout) from comment #7)
> They were there, but bugherder didn't use the firefox 62 milestone but the
> 61 one. It worked correctly for mozilla62. IIRC, that depends on the sort
> order of the milestones.
Okay. I'll have to review the sort order of every milestone in every product... anyway you could help me narrow that down?
Flags: needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
What external tools break if we made all firefox-related products use a consistent milestone and version scheme?
Flags: needinfo?(ehumphries) → needinfo?(ryanvm)
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
I don't understand the question, nor could I possibly know every tool that uses the API and depends on this information. I know that Bugherder assumes things are in a consistent order, which is why issues were hit here.
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
As I said in IRC, I think that was just a timing issue. Next ieration the marker will be moved at the same time as the new version is added.
I reviewed every product and the markers are good now.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
Thank you. Bug 1460013 will make bugherder more robust.
The old assumption was that the first milestone after "---" is the right one for most products: https://github.com/mozilla/bugherder/blob/master/bugherder/js/ConfigurationData.js#L8
In the future it will always look for a direct match for the milestone.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•