Closed
Bug 1466448
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
remove ReflowOutput::mFlags
Categories
(Core :: Layout, enhancement, P3)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla62
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox62 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: heycam, Assigned: heycam)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
ReflowOutput::mFlags is effectively unused, so let's remove it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8982994 [details]
Bug 1466448 - Part 1: Remove unused NS_REFLOW_CALC_BOUNDING_METRICS flag.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248836/#review254972
Attachment #8982994 -
Flags: review?(jfkthame) → review+
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8982995 [details]
Bug 1466448 - Part 2: Remove unused ReflowOutput::mFlags.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248838/#review255060
::: layout/generic/ReflowOutput.h:203
(Diff revision 1)
> // XXX width/height/ascent are OUT parameters and so they shouldn't
> // have to be initialized, but there are some bad frame classes that
> // aren't properly setting them when returning from Reflow()...
I think we should remove this comment too.
Leaving members uninitialized is generally bad.
We could perhaps initialize them to NS_UNCONSTRAINEDSIZE to hopefully catch
the bad code the comment is talking about, if we think that's important.
::: layout/generic/ReflowOutput.h:206
(Diff revision 1)
> - // Some places do it, and some don't. |aFlags| should perhaps go away
> - // entirely.
> // XXX width/height/ascent are OUT parameters and so they shouldn't
> // have to be initialized, but there are some bad frame classes that
> // aren't properly setting them when returning from Reflow()...
> - explicit ReflowOutput(mozilla::WritingMode aWritingMode, uint32_t aFlags = 0)
> + explicit ReflowOutput(mozilla::WritingMode aWritingMode)
I wonder if we can remove one of these ctors?
Most of the callers seems to pass aReflowInput.GetWritingMode() anyway and
the ones that don't are probably wrong.
Can you file a follow-up bug on this please?
Attachment #8982995 -
Flags: review?(mats) → review+
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8982995 [details]
Bug 1466448 - Part 2: Remove unused ReflowOutput::mFlags.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248838/#review255072
::: layout/generic/ReflowOutput.cpp:42
(Diff revision 1)
> -ReflowOutput::ReflowOutput(const ReflowInput& aReflowInput,
> +ReflowOutput::ReflowOutput(const ReflowInput& aReflowInput)
> - uint32_t aFlags)
> : mISize(0)
> , mBSize(0)
> , mBlockStartAscent(ASK_FOR_BASELINE)
> - , mFlags(aFlags)
> , mWritingMode(aReflowInput.GetWritingMode())
Actually, what you can do in this bug is to change the above to:
: ReflowOutput(aReflowInput.GetWritingMode(), aFlags)
to at least avoid the code duplication.
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Erh, without the aFlags of course. :-)
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → cam
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Pushed by cam@mcc.id.au:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/607a37a3553f
Part 1: Remove unused NS_REFLOW_CALC_BOUNDING_METRICS flag. r=jfkthame
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/83ad729b0967
Part 2: Remove unused ReflowOutput::mFlags. r=mats
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/607a37a3553f
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/83ad729b0967
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox62:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla62
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•