Many irrelevant results included in this search
Categories
(Webtools :: Searchfox, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: mstange, Unassigned)
References
Details
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•4 years ago
•
|
||
:mstange, my changes for bug 1641372 potentially result in a change in behavior here and I wanted to see your thoughts. There's more info in https://github.com/mozsearch/mozsearch/pull/408 but the summary is:
- The existing https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=nsdisplayoutline%3A%3Acreat&path= has all of the overloaded superclass/overrides results you didn't want
- The new https://asuth.searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=nsdisplayoutline%3A%3Acreat&path= has just the 1 result grouped by "Definitions (nsDisplayOutline::CreateWebRenderCommands)" because we don't walk up the superclass / overrides automatically.
Would you only want the new behavior in this case, or would you want some combination of:
- Showing the parent override (but not all of its other overrides)
- In a separate group, so we have "Definitions (nsDisplayItem::CreateWebRenderCommands)" in addition to the existing "Definitions (nsDisplayOutline::CreateWebRenderCommands)"
- By having the group header have some interactive pieces like "Definitions (
[x]
nsDisplayOutline::CreateWebRenderCommands,[ ]
overridden nsDisplayItem::CreateWebRenderCommands,[ ]
nsDisplayItem::CreateWebRenderCommands overrides)"
- Optionally showing all of those other overrides, possibly via a search upsell link that is just an entirely new search
- Something else!
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
Great!
The new behavior would definitely work for me.
In addition, linking to separate searches for the superclass implementation and for the overrides would be nice but I don't need it very often.
If you really want to show information about nsDisplayItem::CreateWebRenderCommands on the same search page, then both the definition and the declarations of nsDisplayOutline::CreateWebRenderCommands should come first, above that additional section.
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
With the landing of the structured analysis functionality (bug 1641372), I think this bug can be marked close per comment 3. (Noting that there is some fallout from the changes perhaps being too major, with bug 1729164 being the current open example of that.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Very nice! This works perfectly for my use case. Thank you!
Description
•