Closed
Bug 1467048
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
30.15 - 141.38% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors (on all platforms) regression on push 0014f483953e0066b86796da1d6512214c5be737 (Tue Jun 5 2018)
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla62
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr52 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox61 | --- | unaffected |
firefox62 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: igoldan, Assigned: erahm)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
2.58 KB,
patch
|
froydnj
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We have detected a build metrics regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?changeset=0014f483953e0066b86796da1d6512214c5be737 As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 141% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors android-5-0-aarch64 opt 87.00 -> 210.00 141% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors android-4-0-armv7-api16 opt 87.00 -> 210.00 140% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors android-4-2-x86 opt 88.00 -> 211.00 140% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors osx-cross opt 96.00 -> 230.00 121% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-64 opt static-analysis108.00 -> 239.00 108% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 pgo 119.00 -> 247.00 107% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux32 pgo 120.00 -> 248.00 104% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 opt valgrind 123.00 -> 251.00 104% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 opt base-toolchains 123.00 -> 251.00 104% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux32 opt 123.00 -> 251.00 104% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 opt 123.00 -> 251.00 96% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors android-4-0-armv7-api16 debug 117.00 -> 229.00 55% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-32 pgo 471.00 -> 730.00 50% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-32 opt 514.00 -> 773.00 47% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors osx-cross debug 199.00 -> 293.00 46% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-64 pgo 561.00 -> 820.00 46% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-64 debug static-analysis203.00 -> 296.00 45% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-64 opt 572.00 -> 831.00 34% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 debug base-toolchains239.00 -> 321.00 34% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux32 debug 239.00 -> 321.00 34% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 debug 239.00 -> 321.00 34% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors linux64 debug fuzzing 241.00 -> 323.00 30% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-32 debug 860.00 -> 1,122.00 30% compiler_metrics num_static_constructors windows2012-64 debug 869.00 -> 1,131.00 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=13652 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Performance/Automated_Performance_Testing_and_Sheriffing/Build_Metrics
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(erahm)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the report, we're looking into mitigations but haven't found anything that works yet. Worst case scenario we can back out, but really this is supposed to be short-lived code to help track down crashes. Another option is to limit the code to nightly which would mean we still have a regression but at least it doesn't ride the trains.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
This adds 'CorruptionCanaryForStatics', which as the name implies is suitable for use in objects that are statically declared. It has a trivial destructor which allows us to avoid the need for static constructors.
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → erahm
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
try looks happy: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/graphs?series=try,1468380,1,2&selected=try,1468380,345309,483485694
Flags: needinfo?(erahm)
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Attachment #8983980 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd)
![]() |
||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8983980 [details] [diff] [review] Add a version of CorruptionCanary for statics Review of attachment 8983980 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you! ::: xpcom/base/Logging.h @@ +167,4 @@ > public: > explicit constexpr LazyLogModule(const char* aLogName) > : mLogName(aLogName) > + , mCanary() We can probably remove this, right?
Attachment #8983980 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/14f7dab3a9bd909e8ba5a9b05127f58e31139e63 Bug 1467048 - Add a version of CorruptionCanary for statics. r=froydnj
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nathan Froyd [:froydnj] from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 8983980 [details] [diff] [review] > Add a version of CorruptionCanary for statics > > Review of attachment 8983980 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you! > > ::: xpcom/base/Logging.h > @@ +167,4 @@ > > public: > > explicit constexpr LazyLogModule(const char* aLogName) > > : mLogName(aLogName) > > + , mCanary() > > We can probably remove this, right? Yeah I think so, removed before pushing.
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/14f7dab3a9bd
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
status-firefox62:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla62
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
Awesome, this got entirely fixed!
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•6 years ago
|
status-firefox60:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox61:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr52:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr60:
--- → unaffected
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•