Why not, I'm thinking. Same as oss-fuzz.
8 months ago
Component: General → GFX: Color Management
Product: Firefox → Core
8 months ago
Assignee: nobody → pdknsk
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Attachment #8994357 - Flags: review?(choller) → review+
Pushed by email@example.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d89d8b34e5bd add Qcms fuzzing target dictionary. r=decoder
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 months ago
status-firefox63: --- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla63
Hello, did you mean by any chance chekin-needed?
Thanks, but it was already commited. I can't use checkin-needed.
(In reply to pdknsk from comment #5) > Thanks, but it was already commited. I can't use checkin-needed. You added the checkin to the patch details. When you want a patch to be landed, after it's properly reviewed, you just need to add in the keywords field checkin-needed. Let me know if I can help with anything else.
> You added the checkin to the patch details. When you want a patch to be > landed, after it's properly reviewed, you just need to add in the keywords > field checkin-needed. I had somehow misunderstood from the docs that checkin-needed should be added to the patch. And since checkin-needed is not available as a flag on the patch, I've been using checkin instead. (I thought maybe I don't have permission to use checkin-needed.) I understand now that's its a keyword on the bug, not a flag on the patch. Thanks for the clarification.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.