Open
Bug 1485075
Opened 7 years ago
Updated 3 years ago
Consider more complex policies for 'mach try coverage'
Categories
(Testing :: Code Coverage, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: gabriel-v, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
This is a follow up bug suggested by Marco in review comment https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3115#inline-13912.
In the current implementation, when there are files that are not covered by tests, no tests are run for it.
> We might want to do something different when there are files with no coverage
> information, e.g. run everything, or do different things based on the type of
> the file (for example: if it is Python, then run everything; if it is a plain
> text file, don't run anything).
We might even want to ask the user to run 'mach try all' themselves, instead of running it for them?
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•