Never apply clang-format on code in {{{ check_macroassembler_style

RESOLVED FIXED in Firefox -esr60

Status

defect
RESOLVED FIXED
9 months ago
7 months ago

People

(Reporter: sylvestre, Assigned: sylvestre)

Tracking

(Blocks 1 bug)

Trunk
mozilla64
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(firefox-esr60 fixed, firefox64 fixed)

Details

Attachments

(2 attachments)

Because the python is expecting a very specific programming patterns and it isn't easy to update it.
The python script works with any changes in js/src/.clang-format
Pushed by sledru@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/7127bf67c3b9
Never apply clang-format on code in {{{ check_macroassembler_style r=nbp
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7127bf67c3b9
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 months ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla64
Posted patch ESR patchSplinter Review
[ESR Uplift Approval Request]

If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: This is required for easier backporting of patches after the reformatting of ESR using clang-format.

User impact if declined: Declining this will negatively impact our developers' ability to easily backport their patches to ESR in the future.

Fix Landed on Version: 64

Risk to taking this patch: Low

Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Comment additions only, should not change anything in the binary.  Has also been tested in Nightly for a couple of months or so...

String or UUID changes made by this patch: None
Attachment #9030738 - Flags: approval-mozilla-esr60?
Attachment #9030738 - Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #9030738 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Comment on attachment 9030738 [details] [diff] [review]
ESR patch

OK for uplift to ESR60 as part of the clang-format project.
Attachment #9030738 - Flags: approval-mozilla-esr60? → approval-mozilla-esr60+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.