Open
Bug 1503992
Opened 7 years ago
Updated 1 year ago
Fix the HAVE_ARM_NEON check for aarch64-windows
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Firefox Build System
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: away, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
aarch64-windwos fails this check:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/39cb1e96cf97713c444c5a0404d4f84627aee85d/build/autoconf/arch.m4#222
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Don't we want a separate define (and possibly test) for HAVE_ARM64_NEON? Why do we want to fix this check?
At first glance it is not clear to me what the expectations of code using `#ifdef BUILD_ARM_NEON` are : https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=BUILD_ARM_NEON
Maybe in some places it's controlling codepaths that could just as well work on ARM64?
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Major [:dmajor] from comment #2)
> At first glance it is not clear to me what the expectations of code using
> `#ifdef BUILD_ARM_NEON` are :
> https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=BUILD_ARM_NEON
>
> Maybe in some places it's controlling codepaths that could just as well work
> on ARM64?
See bug 1303952. We should set BUILD_ARM_NEON on aarch64. It is only for arm32.
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
sorry.
s/ We should set BUILD_ARM_NEON on aarch64/We shouldn't set BUILD_ARM_NEON on aarch64/
Per conversation with :kmoir, I'm going through untriaged bugs in her components and marking the ones which look to be enhancements/tasks with the enhancement severity to get them out of the triage queue.
If this incorrect, please remove the tag.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•