Open Bug 1503992 Opened 7 years ago Updated 1 year ago

Fix the HAVE_ARM_NEON check for aarch64-windows

Categories

(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: away, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Don't we want a separate define (and possibly test) for HAVE_ARM64_NEON? Why do we want to fix this check?
At first glance it is not clear to me what the expectations of code using `#ifdef BUILD_ARM_NEON` are : https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=BUILD_ARM_NEON Maybe in some places it's controlling codepaths that could just as well work on ARM64?
(In reply to David Major [:dmajor] from comment #2) > At first glance it is not clear to me what the expectations of code using > `#ifdef BUILD_ARM_NEON` are : > https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=BUILD_ARM_NEON > > Maybe in some places it's controlling codepaths that could just as well work > on ARM64? See bug 1303952. We should set BUILD_ARM_NEON on aarch64. It is only for arm32.
sorry. s/ We should set BUILD_ARM_NEON on aarch64/We shouldn't set BUILD_ARM_NEON on aarch64/

Per conversation with :kmoir, I'm going through untriaged bugs in her components and marking the ones which look to be enhancements/tasks with the enhancement severity to get them out of the triage queue.

If this incorrect, please remove the tag.

Severity: normal → enhancement
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.