Closed
Bug 1513500
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Flex item drawer is shown for elements that are not actually flex items
Categories
(DevTools :: Inspector, defect, P1)
Tracking
(firefox-esr60 unaffected, firefox64 unaffected, firefox65 verified, firefox66 verified)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 66
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox64 | --- | unaffected |
firefox65 | --- | verified |
firefox66 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: mbalfanz, Assigned: mtigley)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(4 files)
572.42 KB,
video/mp4
|
Details | |
266 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
2.28 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
STR:
- Visit https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1409965
- Open the inspector and select #header-item > a
ER:
- sidebar should show flex container section
AR:
- sidebar shows flex container as well as flex item section, though the item section is empty. the selected element is actually not a flex item of div.inner
The problem can be reproduced in multiple places, e.g. for div.dinner.
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Thanks for catching that Martin. I'm fairly sure this must be a regression from bug 1507723, so this is my fault.
We need to find a fix for this and uplift it to 65.
I don't think this is too hard to fix, I think I must have accidentally removed an early return from getCurrentDisplay in devtools/server/actors/layout.js when I refactored that part, and unfortunately we didn't have a test covering that specific case.
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
This is a reduced test case. If you select the deepest div.flex element, then you'll see 2 accordion items in the sidebar, one because it's a container (correct), and one because it's an item (incorrect).
This happens because we walk the DOM up too far.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Blocks: 1507723
status-firefox64:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox65:
--- → affected
status-firefox66:
--- → affected
Keywords: regression
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Micah, I think this might be the right fix, but I'd like your point of view on it.
This is code you modified recently, and then I changed some parts of it. So I would like you to verify the reasoning here (and also pick up the bug if you have time, that'd be great!)
Flags: needinfo?(tigleym)
Updated•6 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(tigleym) → needinfo?(mtigley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Thanks Patrick for providing a patch for this! I will take it from here.
Assignee: nobody → mtigley
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(mtigley)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
I noticed this code will still evaluate a non-flex item node as a flex item if it also happens to be a flex container. This can be reproduced here at https://webflow.com/ by selecting the element .nav_main.
One way we can solve this is using the `dontRecurse` check to know if we are only looking at the node's parent and not the node itself as flex containers. We could also rename `dontRecurse` to `onlyLookAtContainer`. So maybe something like this:
if (flexType && displayType.includes("flex")) {
if (!onlyLookAtContainer) {
return new FlexboxActor(this, node);
}
const container = findFlexOrGridParentContainerForNode(node, type, this.walker);
if (container && flexType) {
return new FlexboxActor(this, container);
}
return null;
}
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by mtigley@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/7ce9fdbbc4b0
Fixed it so getCurrentDisplay also checks if a flex container is actually a flex item. r=pbro
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 66
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9030879 [details]
Bug 1513500 - Fixed it so getCurrentDisplay also checks if a flex container is actually a flex item. r=pbro
[Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request]
Feature/Bug causing the regression: Bug 1507723
User impact if declined: In DevTools' Flexbox inspector, users will be shown flex containers as a flex item of a grandparent flex container. This is incorrect.
Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
Needs manual test from QE?: No
If yes, steps to reproduce:
List of other uplifts needed: None
Risk to taking this patch: Low
Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): The changes are small and only affects how the Flexbox Inspector knows what elements to display as flex items and/or containers.
String changes made/needed:
Attachment #9030879 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9030879 [details]
Bug 1513500 - Fixed it so getCurrentDisplay also checks if a flex container is actually a flex item. r=pbro
[Triage Comment]
Fixes incorrect attribution of flex containers in the Flexbox inspector. Approved for 65.0b5.
Attachment #9030879 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
I have reproduced this issue using Firefox 65.0a1 (2018.12.07) on Win 10 x64.
I can confirm this issue is fixed, I verified using Firefox 65.0b5 build from taskcluster and 66.0a1 on Win 10 x64, Mac OS X 10.14 and Ubuntu 16.04 x64.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: qe-verify+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•