Firefox display of australian open tennis results is incorrect
Categories
(Firefox :: Untriaged, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: harixxxx, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
115.34 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/64.0
Steps to reproduce:
- Go to https://ausopen.com/results#!All
- Click on Day 5
Actual results:
Results for doubles matches are displayed incorrectly - the last player is outside the box
Expected results:
Doubles results should have been displayed properly.
Chrome's display is fine, so this is specific to Firefox.
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Can you please attach a screenshot ?
I do not see anything wrong on that page with Firefox64 and Firefox66 on windows10
Please try also to view the page in the Firefox safemode:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-issues-using-safe-mode
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Image attached showing incorrect display of all doubles results
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Restarted in safe mode (add-ons disabled).
The problem did not go away.
Comment hidden (off-topic) |
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
I can not reproduce this with Firefox 64, Firefox 65 and Firefox 66 in Linux x86_64 either.
Please try with fresh profile as well.
To know about fresh profile: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles
(In reply to Thiagarajan Hariharan from comment #4)
In the firefox menu, if you move the mouse over an item (Library, More, Help, etc), it does not display the sub-menu. You have to click on the item to show the sub-menu. This appears to be (if I remember correctly) new behavior.
I think this behavior is intentional and not a bug.
This should be a separate bug.
Indeed this should be in a different bug and off-topic here.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
Works fine with fresh profile.
Signed into sync with the new profile & still works.
I'll just keep the new profile.
Guess we can consider this resolved though there is likely a bug somewhere.
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Marking as resolved WFM according to comment 6
Description
•