5.09 - 6.19% tsvgx (windows10-64) regression on push 7eac43ea765ebb657f9749a6a8fb2c5c006fae8d (Fri Jan 18 2019)
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: igoldan, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression, talos-regression)
Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push:
As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
6% tsvgx windows10-64 opt e10s stylo 120.27 -> 127.72
5% tsvgx windows10-64 pgo e10s stylo 116.61 -> 122.55
You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=18807
On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.
To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance_sheriffing/Talos/Tests
For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance_sheriffing/Talos/Running
*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***
Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance_sheriffing/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
|
Reporter | |
Updated•5 years ago
|
|
|
Reporter | |
Updated•5 years ago
|
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
These are the Gecko profiles for tsvgx on Windows 10 (OPT builds):
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
If there are any blocked bugs which aren't related to this issue, do remove them from the list.
|
||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
This was more or less expected. Tsvgx is a rather poor test. Tresponsiveness seemed to get a small improvement. The improvement is smaller, but Tresponsiveness is a much more important, and representative test.
|
|
||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
For the record, we are closely monitoring telemetry to make sure no 'real world' regression is observes from these patches.
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
:jwatt you're listed as a contact for the tsvgx test. Can you comment on the value of this test and if we should be concerned with this regression?
|
||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Bas' patches are a trade-off aimed at improving real performance issues. I think we should just accept the regressions for these synthetic Talos tests.
|
|
Reporter | |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•