Closed
Bug 1526060
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
[Shield] Pref-Flip Study: WebRender Performance 66, 66, Release
Categories
(Shield :: Shield Study, enhancement)
Shield
Shield Study
Tracking
(firefox66- affected)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: experimenter, Assigned: relaas)
References
Details
WebRender Performance 66
We believe that enabling WebRender by default does not negatively affect crash statistics nor checkerboarding telemetry values.
More information: https://experimenter.services.mozilla.com/experiments/webrender-performance-66/
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
tracking-firefox66:
--- → ?
Summary: [Shield] Pref-Flip Study: WebRender Performance 66 → [Shield] Pref-Flip Study: WebRender Performance 66, 66, Release
Updated•6 years ago
|
Blocks: stage-wr-trains
Updated•6 years ago
|
status-firefox66:
--- → affected
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Subject: [Shield Study] Sign Off for WebRender Performance 66 - (YELLOW)
WebRender Performance 66
Targeted: Firefox Release 66.0
We have finished testing the WebRender for 66 experiment.
QA’s recommendation: YELLOW - SHIP IT, CONDITIONALLY
Reasoning:
- During testing we found two new issues and came across several known issues.
- A couple of issues are fixed and verified on Nightly 67, but are marked as disabled for Firefox 66.
Testing summary:
- Full Functional test suite: TestRail
Tested Platforms:
- Windows 10 x64 with Nvidia GT 1030
- Windows 10 x64 with Nvidia GT 730
Tested Firefox versions:
- Firefox Beta 66.0b13
- Firefox Beta 66.0b14
- Firefox Release Candidate 66.0
Flags: shield-qa+
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Experiment Type: Pref Flip Study
What is the preference we will be changing
gfx.webrender.all.qualified
What are the branches of the study and what values should
each branch be set to?
- Treatment WebRender Test in 66 is Enabled 50%:
Value: true
In 66, the test group will be to enable WebRender.
- Treatment WebRender Default in 66 is Disabled 50%:
Value: false
In 66 Release the WebRender default setting will still be Disabled. So our control group has it as Disabled.
What version and channel do you intend to ship to?
1.5% of Release Firefox 66.0
Are there specific criteria for participants?
Locales: All
Geographic regions: All
Prefs: -
Studies: -
Any additional filters: normandy.telemetry.main.environment.system.gfx.features.wrQualified.status == 'available'
About 5% of users will meet the wrQualified filter condition, so about 0.075% of clients will actually enroll with a 1.5% filter on client_id.
Power analysis described at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1526041
What is your intended go live date and how long will the study run?
Mar 25, 2019 - Apr 15, 2019 (21 days)
What is the main effect you are looking for and what data will you use to
make these decisions?
overall crash reports ≤ 5% increase in crash rate
OOM crash reports ≤ 5% increase in crash rate
shutdown crashes ≤ 5% increase in crash rate
CANVAS_WEBGL_SUCCESS ≤ 5% regression in median of fraction "True" per user
COMPOSITE_TIME Median per-user fraction of slow frames < 0.5% (absolute)
CONTENT_FRAME_TIME_VSYNC ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user fraction of slow events
CONTENT_FULL_PAINT_TIME ≤ 5% regression in fraction of slow paints (> 16 ms), ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user means
DEVICE_RESET_REASON ≤ 5% increase in reset rate
FX_PAGE_LOAD_MS_2 ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user means
FX_TAB_SWITCH_COMPOSITE_E10S_MS ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user means
Crash (/submission/reset) rates will be measured as events per 1,000 usage hours. A "slow event" means 16 ms or 200% vsync.
Who is the owner of the data analysis for this study?
tdsmith
Will this experiment require uplift?
False
QA Status of your code:
This study is a revision of a currently running study
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1492568
This aren't any code changes - just launching the same study in release.
Link to more information about this study:
https://experimenter.services.mozilla.com/experiments/webrender-performance-66/
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Experiment Type: Pref Flip Study
What is the preference we will be changing
gfx.webrender.all.qualified
What are the branches of the study and what values should
each branch be set to?
- Treatment WebRender Test in 66 is Enabled 50%:
Value: true
In 66, the test group will be to enable WebRender.
- Treatment WebRender Default in 66 is Disabled 50%:
Value: false
In 66 Release the WebRender default setting will still be Disabled. So our control group has it as Disabled.
What version and channel do you intend to ship to?
1.5% of Release Firefox 66.0
Are there specific criteria for participants?
Locales: All
Geographic regions: All
Prefs: -
Studies: -
Any additional filters: normandy.telemetry.main.environment.system.gfx.features.wrQualified.status == 'available'
About 5% of users will meet the wrQualified filter condition, so about 0.075% of clients will actually enroll with a 1.5% filter on client_id.
Power analysis described at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1526041
What is your intended go live date and how long will the study run?
Mar 25, 2019 - Apr 15, 2019 (21 days)
What is the main effect you are looking for and what data will you use to
make these decisions?
overall crash reports ≤ 5% increase in crash rate
OOM crash reports ≤ 5% increase in crash rate
shutdown crashes ≤ 5% increase in crash rate
CANVAS_WEBGL_SUCCESS ≤ 5% regression in median of fraction "True" per user
COMPOSITE_TIME Median per-user fraction of slow frames < 0.5% (absolute)
CONTENT_FRAME_TIME_VSYNC ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user fraction of slow events
CONTENT_FULL_PAINT_TIME ≤ 5% regression in fraction of slow paints (> 16 ms), ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user means
DEVICE_RESET_REASON ≤ 5% increase in reset rate
FX_PAGE_LOAD_MS_2 ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user means
FX_TAB_SWITCH_COMPOSITE_E10S_MS ≤ 5% regression in median of per-user means
Crash (/submission/reset) rates will be measured as events per 1,000 usage hours. A "slow event" means 16 ms or 200% vsync.
Who is the owner of the data analysis for this study?
tdsmith
Will this experiment require uplift?
False
QA Status of your code:
This study is a revision of a currently running study
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1492568
This aren't any code changes - just launching the same study in release.
Link to more information about this study:
https://experimenter.services.mozilla.com/experiments/webrender-performance-66/
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Untracking since we have this information easily findable now in Experimenter.
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
The experiment has ended; followup in bug 1521626.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•