Last Comment Bug 152959 - line-height ignored on (certain) table cells [INLINE]
: line-height ignored on (certain) table cells [INLINE]
: css1, css2, testcase
Product: Core
Classification: Components
Component: Layout: Block and Inline (show other bugs)
: Trunk
: All All
P2 normal with 2 votes (vote)
: Future
Assigned To: David Baron :dbaron: ⌚️UTC-8
: Jet Villegas (:jet)
Depends on: 153032
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2002-06-19 16:05 PDT by Hixie (not reading bugmail)
Modified: 2009-08-23 20:15 PDT (History)
8 users (show)
See Also:
Crash Signature:
QA Whiteboard:
Iteration: ---
Points: ---
Has Regression Range: ---
Has STR: ---


Description User image Hixie (not reading bugmail) 2002-06-19 16:05:09 PDT
The line-height property is being ignored on table cells.

This is a serious bug, and is one of the few remaining issues we have with our
inline box model.

This is a recent regression.
Comment 1 User image David Baron :dbaron: ⌚️UTC-8 2002-06-19 16:06:36 PDT
Ian is referring to bug 151620.
Comment 2 User image Hixie (not reading bugmail) 2002-06-19 16:12:05 PDT
HTML testcase:
Comment 3 User image Aaron Kaluszka 2002-06-19 16:25:48 PDT
I was afraid of that after looking at how the patch actually operated.  See bug
152959 comment 52 and bug 152959 comment 53 for an alternate (but not as simple)
proposal on how to fix the issue at hand while avoiding bugs like this.
Comment 5 User image Hixie (not reading bugmail) 2002-06-19 17:36:11 PDT
Even more testcases:

All six testcases work fine on 1.0 branch builds and on trunk builds from before
the bug 151620 checkin.
Comment 6 User image Jonas Jørgensen 2002-07-08 06:44:58 PDT
If the fix for bug 151620 was backed out with the landing of bug 153032, isn't
this bug fixed now?
Comment 7 User image Hixie (not reading bugmail) 2002-07-08 10:30:34 PDT
Strangely, no. the following test case (XML and HTML versions) are still broken:
Comment 8 User image David Baron :dbaron: ⌚️UTC-8 2002-07-08 10:32:05 PDT
Yeah, I did mention at one point in another bug that I thought our behavior
wasn't quite right.
Comment 9 User image David Baron :dbaron: ⌚️UTC-8 2002-07-08 10:32:50 PDT
In any case, not a regression, and no longer critical for 1.1 (I think).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.