Closed Bug 1536488 Opened 7 months ago Closed 6 months ago

Tracking-annotation should use strict list always

Categories

(Core :: Privacy: Anti-Tracking, enhancement, P2)

enhancement

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla68
Tracking Status
firefox68 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: baku, Assigned: baku)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

The difference between strict and basic tracking list is about the content-tracking table. In this bug, I would like to use the content-tracking table always, and to have a separate pref to decide when we want to consider it to detect trackers.

If a channel's URL is found in the content-tracking list, it will be classified using nsIHttpChannel::ClassificationFlags::CLASSIFIED_TRACKING_CONTENT. But nsIHttpChannel::IsTrackingResource() would return false if we are in basic-tracking-list mode.

Priority: -- → P2
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla68
Blocks: 1530050
Pushed by amarchesini@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/597f8780f073
Tracking-annotation should use strict list always, r=dimi
See Also: → 1539637
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 months ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 months ago6 months ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

(In reply to Bogdan Tara[:bogdan_tara] from comment #4)

Backed out 4 changesets (Bug 1541238, Bug 1542069, Bug 1533363) for build bustages - missing Bug 1536488
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/ca196717df07

Hi Baku, can you uplift this to beta for Bug 1541238, Bug 1542069, and Bug 1533363?

Flags: needinfo?(amarchesini)

Tanvi, what do you think about this uplift? I suspect it could break some shield studies.

Flags: needinfo?(amarchesini) → needinfo?(tanvi)
No longer blocks: 1541238

We are no longer going to try to uplift the other bugs so we don't need to uplift this one.

Flags: needinfo?(tanvi)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.