moz-phab doesn't accept . (period) in reviewer's name
Categories
(Conduit :: moz-phab, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: allstars.chh, Assigned: zeid)
References
Details
(Keywords: conduit-triaged)
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
My username in phabricator is allstars.chh
However when submitting a review with r?allstars.chh, phabricator complains
- allstars is not a valid reviewer's name
It looks like phabricator doesn't accept reviewer has a '.' in his/her username.
perhaps from https://github.com/mozilla-conduit/review/blob/master/moz-phab#L143 ?
Or if this is by design, I am okay to change my username. :P
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
•
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/hgcustom/version-control-tools/file/7951e7b5e7bf5144d1864b212f2db46e5f3ccfbb/pylib/mozautomation/mozautomation/commitparser.py#l44
https://github.com/mozilla-conduit/review/blob/master/moz-phab#L149
see IRC_NICK
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
WIP DO NOT MERGE
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
This change allows there to be a single character without a period as a
reviewer name, as well as adds tests to ensure that various combinations
of periods and characters work as reviewer names.
Depends on D58945
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
It looks like this has a reviewed and accepted patch, can it land?
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Hi :TbSync -- I think we can add this to the next release. Since the revision has been sitting for a long time, I just want to do some sanity checks before we land it.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•