Green up talos-perf-reftest-singletons (talos-ps) on Windows 10 aarch64
Categories
(Testing :: Performance, defect, P2)
Tracking
(firefox71 fixed)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox71 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: stephend, Assigned: stephend)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
Green up talos-perf-reftest-singletons (https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/b2015fdd464f598d645342614593d4ebda922d95/taskcluster/ci/test/talos.yml#305-320) runs (currently relagated to try by the trail in bug 1547044, bug 1546595, and bug 1531876) on Windows 10 aarch64.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
•
|
||
First recent push to try
here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&tier=1%2C2%2C3&revision=e4e665eea76af0d975b7eb401101672b5ed7581e
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Bobby, I'm guessing, but not assuming, that https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance_sheriffing/Talos/Tests#perf-reftest-singletons is out-of-date, and there's potentially a better contact to ask the following:
Given this seems stable on try
, would you/team want this back on (an)other branch(es)? Thanks!
Also, I'll happily update https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance_sheriffing/Talos/Tests#perf-reftest-singletons with the correct owner(s), once identified.
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
So that I understand - this is about bringing up that particular talos sub-suite (which currently runs on most platforms) for windows aarch64?
If so, I think we might as well turn them on, unless there's a reason not to - for consistency if nothing else. Thoughts Cameron?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Bobby Holley (:bholley) from comment #3)
So that I understand - this is about bringing up that particular talos sub-suite (which currently runs on most platforms) for windows aarch64?
<snip>
Yes, and sorry for the delay in responding (PTO + paternity); new try
push here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&tier=1%2C2%2C3&revision=b1f7e3ac51373041f23bf7c5a05ae8706350c295
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
If these tests are running, and they're not abnormally noisy or anything, then I don't see any reason not to turn them on. If the tests are broken for some reason, I would want to check on our ARM64 priorities before looking into that.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cameron McCormack (:heycam) from comment #5)
If these tests are running, and they're not abnormally noisy or anything, then I don't see any reason not to turn them on. If the tests are broken for some reason, I would want to check on our ARM64 priorities before looking into that.
Great, thanks; a followup question and a request, if you would?
- Is the information on https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/Tests#perf-reftest-singletons up-to-date, still? i.e. if I/others need to pester someone (sorry) about this test, whom would that be? Still Bobby, or you, now, Cam?
- For this test, are the current
mozilla-central
andtry
branches enough coverage? (Or, am I not understandingtalos.yaml
quite right, and perhaps it'll also pick uptrunk
from the defaults section? https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/9bb55ae4d808fc48afcf93f99da6a685265b86c6/taskcluster/ci/test/talos.yml#311-322
Thanks!
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Probably best to put my name down there.
I am honestly not familiar enough with talos.yml
to know what's the right thing to put there, and I also don't know what trunk
refers to. But I suggest copying one of the other configurations that looks like it doesn't have any special cases, so:
linux64-ccov/.*: ['try']
windows10-64-ccov/.*: ['try']
(?:windows10-64|windows7-32|linux64)(?:-qr)?/opt: ['mozilla-central', 'try']
windows10-aarch64/opt: ['mozilla-central', 'try']
macosx.*64(?:-shippable)?(?:-qr)?/opt: ['mozilla-central', 'try']
default: ['mozilla-beta', 'trunk', 'try']
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
- Thanks, Cam, Bobby; I've updated the wiki with Cam as the new owner/contact, dev-side: https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=TestEngineering%2FPerformance%2FTalos%2FTests&type=revision&diff=1217429&oldid=1217380
- re: adding in
mozilla-beta
to the default; I'll get a patch tested + up - This looks largely stable now on
windows10-aarch64
: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-central&selectedJob=266297154&tier=1%2C2%2C3&searchStr=perf-reftest-singleton%2Caarch
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Just to leave a bit of a paper trail/breadcrumb, here, I filed and fixed up talos-perf-reftest
to also have the mozilla-beta
branch included in its defaults, over in bug 1581607 (thanks for the suggestion/request, Cam!)
Description
•