WPAD: automatic configuration does not lookup wpad in parent DNS domains
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: eole-team, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
43.32 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0
Steps to reproduce:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/66.0
OS: Ubuntu Bionic
- we have a domain example.net where wpad.example.net configure the proxy for every hosts
- we have a subdomain ad.example.net for a Samba4 Active Directory, all workstation are under that DNS domain
- we configure firefox for proxy auto-detection using WPAD
Actual results:
Firefox try to lookup:
- wpad.ad.example.net
- wpad
Here are the tshark logs
1 0.000000000 127.0.0.1 → 127.0.0.53 DNS 96 Standard query 0x39c8 A wpad.ad.example.net OPT
2 0.000021291 127.0.0.1 → 127.0.0.53 DNS 96 Standard query 0x50d6 AAAA wpad.ad.example.net OPT
3 0.000525760 10.1.2.50 → 10.1.2.1 DNS 96 Standard query 0x8a0c A wpad.ad.example.net OPT
4 0.000720855 10.1.2.50 → 10.1.2.1 DNS 96 Standard query 0x5fbf AAAA wpad.ad.example.net OPT
5 0.002877691 10.1.2.1 → 10.1.2.50 DNS 96 Standard query response 0x5fbf No such name AAAA wpad.ad.example.net OPT
6 0.003052110 10.1.2.50 → 10.1.2.1 DNS 85 Standard query 0x5fbf AAAA wpad.ad.example.net
7 0.003422653 10.1.2.1 → 10.1.2.50 DNS 96 Standard query response 0x8a0c No such name A wpad.ad.example.net OPT
8 0.003432283 10.1.2.1 → 10.1.2.50 DNS 85 Standard query response 0x5fbf No such name AAAA wpad.ad.example.net
9 0.003499256 10.1.2.50 → 10.1.2.1 DNS 85 Standard query 0x8a0c A wpad.ad.example.net
10 0.003636164 127.0.0.53 → 127.0.0.1 DNS 96 Standard query response 0x50d6 No such name AAAA wpad.ad.example.net OPT
11 0.003815724 10.1.2.1 → 10.1.2.50 DNS 85 Standard query response 0x8a0c No such name A wpad.ad.example.net
12 0.003903402 127.0.0.53 → 127.0.0.1 DNS 96 Standard query response 0x39c8 No such name A wpad.ad.example.net OPT
13 0.003968819 127.0.0.1 → 127.0.0.53 DNS 77 Standard query 0x7d5f A wpad OPT
14 0.003976404 127.0.0.1 → 127.0.0.53 DNS 77 Standard query 0x7066 AAAA wpad OPT
15 0.004077340 127.0.0.53 → 127.0.0.1 DNS 77 Standard query response 0x7d5f Server failure A wpad OPT
16 0.004165124 127.0.0.53 → 127.0.0.1 DNS 77 Standard query response 0x7066 Server failure AAAA wpad OPT
17 0.004197900 127.0.0.1 → 127.0.0.53 DNS 77 Standard query 0x7d5f A wpad OPT
18 0.004203840 127.0.0.1 → 127.0.0.53 DNS 77 Standard query 0x7066 AAAA wpad OPT
Expected results:
Firefox should have tried to resolve the following DNS names:
- wpad.ad.example.net
- wpad.example.net
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Proxy_Auto-Discovery_Protocol
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Is your proxy setting at "Auto-detect proxy settings for this network" under options/network settings?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Yes, that's exactly the setting used.
Without it, there is no DNS request for wpad.ad.example.net
.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Here is the screen shot of the parameter, to be sure.
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
I believe we are not resolving upper-level domains on purpose, as it's seen as a potential security issue.
You may configure WPAD (PAC) URL using DHCP option 252, which we support since firefox 63.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
We use the DHCP option 252
for windows machine:
option wpad-url code 252 = text;
option wpad-url "http://wpad.ad.example.net/wpad.dat\n";
but Firefox on GNU/Linux does not use it.
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
// We diverge from the WPAD spec here in that we don't walk the
// hosts's FQDN, stripping components until we hit a TLD. Doing so
// is dangerous in the face of an incomplete list of TLDs, and TLDs
// get added over time. We could consider doing only a single
// substitution of the first component, if that proves to help
// compatibility.
aSpec.AssignLiteral(MOZ_WPAD_URL);
I think this is the reason for that.
WONTFIX?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Dragana, are you OK with WONTFIX'ing this bug?
As the comment says, We could consider doing only a single substitution of the first component, if that proves to help compatibility. but I'm not sure whether we actually want to do that.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
it is fine.
Description
•