Page style "no style" no longer works on local files
Categories
(Firefox :: Menus, defect, P5)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: yoasif, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
As seen on reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/brjtc7/no_page_style_doesnt_work_on_local_files/
STR:
- Open local html file with CSS styling.
- view -> page style -> no style
What happens:
Page styling doesn't get removed.
Expected result:
As before 67; page styling is removed.
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Mike, how do you feel about priority here? Is this easy to fix? webextensions don't have access to file:///, and I don't know how easy it is to specify an actor match pattern here that does include files...
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
ActorManagerChild does its matching using the same logic as the WebExtension URL matcher, but I believe has a broader range of schemes it will allow by default. I believe file:// is one of them.
So, I think we can just add file:// to this list: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/BrowserGlue.jsm#241, and this will work again.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Firefox version 70 is still affected.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
All further Firefox versions up to 103.0 are still affected. How about correction timeline?
This function is needed by Web Developers to check pages for handicaped people (blind) before upload to production site!
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
This was supposedly fixed by bug 1650603. Maybe bug 1650603 needs reopening.
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to bugzilla.mozilla.org from comment #4)
All further Firefox versions up to 103.0 are still affected. How about correction timeline?
This function is needed by Web Developers to check pages for handicaped people (blind) before upload to production site!
Can you comment on bug 1650603 if you're still seeing this in newer versions of Firefox?
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Thanks for your reply; your answer is right, now it works and bug(s) can be closed as resolved.
Description
•