Open
Bug 1565292
Opened 6 years ago
Updated 4 days ago
Consider using CONNECT for all (even non-secure) e2e requests to an HTTP(2) proxy
Categories
(Core :: Networking: Proxy, enhancement, P3)
Core
Networking: Proxy
Tracking
()
NEW
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox70 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: mayhemer, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])
-
advantages:
- general availability of 'tunnels' for anything, but I think we already have that
- better and more trustworthy e2e conn error reporting
-
disadvantages:
- added round trip/bug 1548796
- more complexity added
- need a new protocol proxy->browser to let the browser know that the proxy can do connect to any (or what) port(s)
- and/or need a probe+fallback mechanism (more added complexity and round trips) for proxies that don't support this
Think of possible security implications when the proxy allows connection to any port (or wide range of ports)
Think of how this relates to RFC 8441.
![]() |
Reporter | |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Whiteboard: [necko-triaged]
![]() |
||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Changing to corp confidential temporarily (till after Sept 10) on Tony and elan's request.
Group: mozilla-employee-confidential
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Moving bug to Core/Networking: Proxy.
Component: Networking: HTTP → Networking: Proxy
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Moving bug to Core/Networking: Proxy
Updated•4 days ago
|
Group: mozilla-employee-confidential
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•