Closed Bug 156997 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

Fix up error pages with plain English descriptions and a nice appearance

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: adamlock, Assigned: lorikaplan)

References

Details

(Keywords: helpwanted)

Attachments

(5 files, 2 obsolete files)

The XHTML error pages that appear when a page cannot be loaded or a host is unreachable need to be fixed up with proper descriptions and a nice appearance. See bug 28586 for more info.
Blocks: errorpages
Am I right in thinking that the current error messages are those listed in http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/docshell/base/appstrings.properties?
appstrings.properties contains the short error descriptions and is shared with the the message box errors. BTW bug 156988 will move it from docshell/base into docshell/resources along with the other error page things. The long error descriptions are contained here: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/docshell/resources/locale/en-US/netError.dtd At the moment the long descriptions are just placeholders, but hopefully we can puts some decent descriptions in there. The XHTML & JS that build the page are here: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/docshell/resources/content/ netError.xhtml includes netError.js & netError.dtd. It has an onload handler that calls a js method called fillIn() which extracts the error id, the short description and the bad url from the location and insets them. The long descriptions are held in hidden DIV elements, one of which is shown depending on the value of the error id. I tried to insert the long desc entities dynamically, but they don't expand out, hence the reason I'm using hidden DIVs. The mechanics of the error page aren't set in stone. This is just a first working cut and is open to modification and improvement.
Taking.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P1
Hardware: PC → All
Attaching for mpt...
Comment on attachment 95416 [details] Sample error page: Host not found .
Attachment #95416 - Attachment mime type: text/xml → text/html
Comment on attachment 95415 [details] Style sheet for error pages This style sheet will need to be made platform-specific, for things like obeying platform-specific alert element spacing, and not scaling the `caption' font on OS/2 (where it might be a bitmap font). Before that happens, three problems should be fixed. (1) The DD element has extra whitespace at the top and I don't know why. (2) The whitespace between the DT and the DD should be a margin-right or similar for the DT, not a padding-left for the DD (so that the whitespace would not be present in cases when the DT was omitted). When I try and do that, however, the DD clears to below the DT instead of remaining beside it. (3) Various elements add extra whitespace to the bottom, beyond the 1em that should be present. This isn't noticable unless you resize the window to slightly more than 1em taller than the error message, whereupon you'll get an enabled vertical scrollbar when you shouldn't. (To see what I'm talking about, add * { border: 1px dotted green; }.)
Attachment #95415 - Flags: needs-work+
Comment on attachment 95416 [details] Sample error page: Host not found This is an example error page. Note that the long message itself contains HTML in the form of a <code> element: I suppose %1 in the properties file could be replaced by <code>nameofHost</code>.
uid is being phased out.
Assignee: mpt → adamlock
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: User Interface Design → Embedding: Docshell
QA Contact: zach → adamlock
What is replacing uid? This bug really needs to go to people who'd like design some nice error pages. The docshell doesn't care much what the pages look like.
Keywords: helpwanted
there is no replacement. assign bugs to people and leave them in the component where the code lives.
Assignee: adamlock → lorikaplan
Attached patch Some plain English descriptions (obsolete) — Splinter Review
I have attached a sample set of plain English descriptions. Thoughts? We should whack this in (or something similar) and work on the CSS stuff separately.
Attached patch Patch 2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Second patch clears up text a little and adds some sample styling to the xhtml.
Attachment #105468 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Can someone please review this? The patch is much better than what is there now and migth stimulate more work on the error page stuff.
Comment on attachment 105512 [details] [diff] [review] Patch 2 >Index: mozilla/docshell/resources/content/netError.js >@@ -47,10 +47,11 @@ > var i; > > // Fill in the title >- var titleText = "&" + err + ".title;"; >- document.title = titleText; >+ var et = document.getElementById("et_" + err); >+ if (et != null) { wouldn't just |if (et) {| work? >+ et.setAttribute("class", "et_visible"); do et.className = "et_visible" instead. > // Long description >- var d = document.getElementById(err); >- d.setAttribute("style", "display: block;"); >+ var ld = document.getElementById("ld_" + err); >+ if (ld != null) { >+ ld.setAttribute("class", "ld_visible"); >+ } Same here With that, r=sicking
Attachment #105512 - Flags: review+
Attached patch Patch 2 updatedSplinter Review
Updated following review suggestions. I've also removed the search functionality. It can be reinstanted for bug 161276.
Attachment #105512 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment on attachment 105512 [details] [diff] [review] Patch 2 Can I have an sr on this patch to improve the error pages? Thanks
Attachment #105512 - Flags: superreview?(hewitt)
Comment on attachment 105512 [details] [diff] [review] Patch 2 Wrong patch, try again
Attachment #105512 - Flags: superreview?(hewitt)
Attachment #108911 - Flags: superreview?(hewitt)
Suggestions for wording changes in the error messages from Attachment #108911 [details] [diff]. For protocolNotFound.title: "Not Known" seems clearer than "Not Found" for a bad protocol, eg: "Protocol htp: Not Known" vs "Protocol htp: Not Found". This also fits in better with the text of the error which uses "uknown". - Protocol Not Found Error + Protocol Not Known Error For protocolNotFound.longDesc: Adding the incorrect protocol into the error text will make it easier for a user to know if they mistyped or at least where the error is. They might not know that http is a protocol, but will probably recognize that htp is wrong. - ... starts with a protocol that is not recognized ... + ... starts with a protocol (fill in bad protocol here) that is not recognized ...
I'll change the first string, however the second issue requires programmatic string formatting, so I'd rather leave it until a later checkin. I just want to put something in now which is significantly better than the existing error page. It might spur some other people to champion this feature and refine it even further.
Comment on attachment 108911 [details] [diff] [review] Patch 2 updated Ben, could you give an sr on this change please?
Attachment #108911 - Flags: superreview?(hewitt) → superreview?(ben)
Over at MZ's Phoenix forums, some people have been posting concept designs for the XUL error pages. Some of them are really good. http://www.mozillazine.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3463
Comment on attachment 108911 [details] [diff] [review] Patch 2 updated at some point it would be nice to move all the CSS into an external CSS file, perhaps... Also, do you really need the <p> tags? Why not just use the <div>s? Or style the <p>s directly?
Attachment #108911 - Flags: superreview?(ben) → superreview+
Attached image A sample screenshot
Sample screenshot of what it will look like. If you want to improve on it after the fix goes in, the source is all there...
This seems like a step backwards. No search or retry.
Fix is checked in. Search was zapped because I hardcoded Google which was bad and I didn't see a way to get a 'favourite' search URL from the prefs. Retry is still there - the "Try Again" link. I *hope* this checkin is enough to get people thinking how to improve it further :)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Further to my last comment, bug 161276 deals with making the search option configurable.
How does one turn this on?
You need to set the hidden pref browser.xul.error.pages.enabled to true
Attached file pdf crit of screenshot
The attachment is in pdf format. It is a quick crit of Adam's screenshot (mentioned in comment 24) with a variation. Is there an appropriate newsgroup to discuss this in?
Attachment #111192 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → application/pdf
This doesn´t work for me. Since this fix landed I get a page only with the "Try again" link in it. Somehow all the DIVs in netError.xhtml remain invisible as if fillIn() was never called. Build ID 2003011208, Windows XP with SP1
Stefan: do you maybe have javascript disabled?0.
doesn't work for me either on yesterday's nightly on win2k, script is enabled. hadn't commented because I hadn't had a chance to investigate...
biesi: JavaScript is enabled. I just tested this with a fresh CVS build under Debian Linux and it works. Could this be a Windows-only problem?
still doesn't work for me 2003011308/win2k. based on that, Stefan's comment, and others on IRC, reopening... can someone try this with a windows build and see what's up?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
WFM with XP (all builds since it was checked in). My only "nit" is that everything should be left aligned to the same margin, or at least "Try again" to the error text - but I do see everything.
Is the problem theme-related perhaps? Out of interest, do you have 'use system colors' or custom colours or similar set? Because I notice that the error page has incompletely specified colour usage (e.g. doesn't specify foreground text colour for the majority of the page, but does specify the background colour of the main text block).
To whom was that question directed? <grin> I do NOT have use system colors set - I'm using the color and background as specified by the Web site. The only other variable here might be that I'm using the Modern theme (under Mozilla) and a custom Windows theme.
tried theme changes and it made no difference. colour settings are all default (besides, the "try again" appears right at the top of the window), so it's not that. after some further experimenting, I've discovered that if I remove my prefs.js file and leave only the line to enable this in user.js, it works. so it's something lurking in my prefs.js file. will continue to investigate. re-resolving as fixed for the moment, as it's clearly not a general problem.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
have reduced my prefs.js down to minimum necessary to cause the problem. with no user.js and a prefs.js containing just these three lines, it fails as I described: user_pref("browser.xul.error_pages.enabled", true); user_pref("capability.principal.certificate.p0.granted", "UniversalXPConnect"); user_pref("capability.principal.certificate.p0.id", "72:39:8D:54:A7:8C:17:90:37:8B:D3:7D:7D:0C:87:C5:C9:C4:55:E1"); have no idea what script those lines are for, but I don't understand why it should cause the error pages to fail. suggestions? new bug? not a problem? Stefan - do you have anything similar in your prefs.js?
FYI: I got a problem with the new error page and a clean (clobbered( cvs build. I got only the "try again" link but nothing more. It worked in a new profile but a fast repair of my old profile didn't fix it. (delete cache\*.*, xul.mfl, localstore.rdf, chrome\*.* ) After that i deleted all lines in my prefs.js except for Mailnews and it worked after that.n (also after setting my old prefs back with the GUI)
Michael: I had the following two lines in my prefs.js: user_pref("capability.principal.codebase.p0.granted", "UniversalXPConnect"); user_pref("capability.principal.codebase.p0.id", "http://bugzilla.mozilla.org"); After removing them I now see the new error pages.
confirming with nightly build 2003011508 (win98se), after removing following lines from my prefs.js: user_pref("capability.principal.certificate.p0.granted", "UniversalXPConnect"); user_pref("capability.principal.certificate.p0.id", "72:39:8D:54:A7:8C:17:90:37:8B:D3:7D:7D:0C:87:C5:C9:C4:55:E1"); i'm now seeing nice error pages. by the way, that "try again" link didn't even work with those lines in prefs.js.
Filed Bug 204068 about the issue described in comment #39 through comment #43.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: