15.3 - 15.56% build times (linux64-shippable) regression on push 16d1399f602c8a336e8f6e7a160f0e698aff486d (Fri July 19 2019)
Categories
(Testing :: General, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: alexandrui, Unassigned, Mentored)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
We have detected a build metrics regression from push:
As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
16% build times linux64-shippable opt nightly taskcluster-c5d.4xlarge 3,717.69 -> 4,296.07
15% build times linux64-shippable opt nightly taskcluster-c5d.4xlarge 3,705.14 -> 4,272.06
You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=22132
On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the jobs in a pushlog format.
To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Performance/Automated_Performance_Testing_and_Sheriffing/Build_Metrics
*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Comparing to the previous autoland commit, the compile subtest seems to have the most regressions:
compile graph 3650.16 < 4034.57 10.53%
Retriggered some nearby builds to see if they show the regression
The browser/components/newtab changes shouldn't have much impact on compile measurement as they should be just packaged and not compiled… (?)
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
After some retriggers to run on c5d.4xlarge (see first link comment 1), looks like there isn't much regression from bug 1567243?
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Here's the commits from the original suspect commit and the next one that ran on c5d.4xlarge:
Nathan Froyd — Bug 1486042 - default clang-cl pgo to use cross-language LTO; r=dmajor
Could this have caused build times to regress ? (Retrigging some builds right now…)
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Ah, I see there was bug 1568152 which was marked WONTFIX, so this might be a dupe of that one.
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Ah yup I see bug 1569202 too.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
Hi Ed, sorry for replying this late. Yes, looks like this is a duplicate of 1568152 and 1569202. Thanks for taking care of this!
Description
•